• Rustam Al-Shahi Salman, Joseph Frantzias, Robert J Lee, Patrick D Lyden, BatteyThomas W KTWKDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA., Alison M Ayres, Joshua N Goldstein, Stephan A Mayer, Thorsten Steiner, Xia Wang, Hisatomi Arima, Hitoshi Hasegawa, Makoto Oishi, Daniel A Godoy, Luca Masotti, Dar Dowlatshahi, David Rodriguez-Luna, Carlos A Molina, Dong-Kyu Jang, Antonio Davalos, José Castillo, Xiaoying Yao, Jan Claassen, Bastian Volbers, Seiji Kazui, Yasushi Okada, Shigeru Fujimoto, Kazunori Toyoda, Qi Li, Jane Khoury, Pilar Delgado, José Álvarez Sabín, Mar Hernández-Guillamon, Luis Prats-Sánchez, Chunyan Cai, Mahesh P Kate, Rebecca McCourt, Chitra Venkatasubramanian, Michael N Diringer, Yukio Ikeda, Hans Worthmann, Wendy C Ziai, Christopher D d'Esterre, Richard I Aviv, Peter Raab, Yasuo Murai, Allyson R Zazulia, Kenneth S Butcher, Seyed Mohammad Seyedsaadat, James C Grotta, Joan Martí-Fàbregas, Joan Montaner, Joseph Broderick, Haruko Yamamoto, Dimitre Staykov, E Sander Connolly, Magdy Selim, Rogelio Leira, Byung Hoo Moon, Andrew M Demchuk, Mario Di Napoli, Yukihiko Fujii, Craig S Anderson, Jonathan Rosand, VISTA-ICH Collaboration, and ICH Growth Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis Collaborators.
• Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. Electronic address: rustam.al-shahi@ed.ac.uk.
• Lancet Neurol. 2018 Oct 1; 17 (10): 885-894.

BackgroundIntracerebral haemorrhage growth is associated with poor clinical outcome and is a therapeutic target for improving outcome. We aimed to determine the absolute risk and predictors of intracerebral haemorrhage growth, develop and validate prediction models, and evaluate the added value of CT angiography.MethodsIn a systematic review of OVID MEDLINE-with additional hand-searching of relevant studies' bibliographies- from Jan 1, 1970, to Dec 31, 2015, we identified observational cohorts and randomised trials with repeat scanning protocols that included at least ten patients with acute intracerebral haemorrhage. We sought individual patient-level data from corresponding authors for patients aged 18 years or older with data available from brain imaging initially done 0·5-24 h and repeated fewer than 6 days after symptom onset, who had baseline intracerebral haemorrhage volume of less than 150 mL, and did not undergo acute treatment that might reduce intracerebral haemorrhage volume. We estimated the absolute risk and predictors of the primary outcome of intracerebral haemorrhage growth (defined as >6 mL increase in intracerebral haemorrhage volume on repeat imaging) using multivariable logistic regression models in development and validation cohorts in four subgroups of patients, using a hierarchical approach: patients not taking anticoagulant therapy at intracerebral haemorrhage onset (who constituted the largest subgroup), patients taking anticoagulant therapy at intracerebral haemorrhage onset, patients from cohorts that included at least some patients taking anticoagulant therapy at intracerebral haemorrhage onset, and patients for whom both information about anticoagulant therapy at intracerebral haemorrhage onset and spot sign on acute CT angiography were known.FindingsOf 4191 studies identified, 77 were eligible for inclusion. Overall, 36 (47%) cohorts provided data on 5435 eligible patients. 5076 of these patients were not taking anticoagulant therapy at symptom onset (median age 67 years, IQR 56-76), of whom 1009 (20%) had intracerebral haemorrhage growth. Multivariable models of patients with data on antiplatelet therapy use, data on anticoagulant therapy use, and assessment of CT angiography spot sign at symptom onset showed that time from symptom onset to baseline imaging (odds ratio 0·50, 95% CI 0·36-0·70; p<0·0001), intracerebral haemorrhage volume on baseline imaging (7·18, 4·46-11·60; p<0·0001), antiplatelet use (1·68, 1·06-2·66; p=0·026), and anticoagulant use (3·48, 1·96-6·16; p<0·0001) were independent predictors of intracerebral haemorrhage growth (C-index 0·78, 95% CI 0·75-0·82). Addition of CT angiography spot sign (odds ratio 4·46, 95% CI 2·95-6·75; p<0·0001) to the model increased the C-index by 0·05 (95% CI 0·03-0·07).InterpretationIn this large patient-level meta-analysis, models using four or five predictors had acceptable to good discrimination. These models could inform the location and frequency of observations on patients in clinical practice, explain treatment effects in prior randomised trials, and guide the design of future trials.FundingUK Medical Research Council and British Heart Foundation.Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

13 keywords...

hide…