• Bertrand Guihard, Fanny Rouyer, David Serrano, Jérôme Sudrial, and Xavier Combes.
• Emergency and Accident Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la Réunion, Saint-Denis, Réunion.
• J Emerg Med. 2018 Mar 1; 54 (3): 281-286.

BackgroundThe insertion of peripheral venous catheters (PVCs) is the invasive procedure most frequently performed in hospitals, and it could be associated with complications. The appropriateness of PVC placement, however, has not been carefully analyzed.ObjectivesWe conducted a study to assess the rate of PVC placement in our Emergency Department (ED), their use, their immediate or potential usefulness, and their complications.MethodsIn this descriptive prospective study, we recorded every PVC placed in our ED during 1 week and assessed its appropriateness in terms of its use and potential usefulness. We then followed the patients transferred to medical wards to determine the duration of PVC maintenance and any complications.ResultsPVCs (n = 210) were placed for 34% (n = 207) of the 605 patients admitted to the ED during the study period. Of these PVCs, 27% (n = 52) were not used and 43% (n = 91) were considered ineffective. Follow-up covered 92 patients with PVCs transferred to medical wards. We recorded seven episodes of phlebitis (8%) and no infections, local or systemic. The mean duration of PVS maintenance in the medical wards was 40 h from insertion. Of the PVCs with complications, 43% were ineffective. The mean duration of maintenance of the PVCs that led to complications was 80 h, compared with 35 h for those without complications (p < 0.02).ConclusionIn accordance with the literature, half of the PVCs inserted in our ED were ineffective; half the PVCs causing complications were avoidable.Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

22 keywords...

hide…