• Jesse M Pines, Mark S Zocchi, Caitlin Carter, Charles Z Marriott, Matthew Bernard, and Leah H Warner.
• Center for Healthcare Innovation & Policy Research, Washington, DC.
• Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Oct 1; 25 (10): 1146-1156.

ObjectivePoint-of-care testing (POCT) is a commonly used technology that hastens the time to laboratory results in emergency departments (ED). We evaluated an ED-based POCT program on ED length of stay (LOS) and time to care, coupled with qualitative interviews of local ED stakeholders.MethodsWe conducted a mixed-methods study (2012-2016) to examine the impact of POCT in a single, community ED. The quantiative analysis involved an observational before-after study comparing time to laboratory test result (POC troponin or POC chemistry) and ED LOS after implementation of POCT, using a propensity-weighted interrupted time series analysis (ITSA). A complementary qualitative analysis involved five semistructured interviews with staff using grounded theory on the benefits and challenges to ED POCT.ResultsA total of 47,399 ED visits were included in the study (24,705 in the preintervention period and 22,694 in the postintervention period). After POCT implementation, overall laboratory testing increased marginally from 61% to 62%. Central laboratory troponin and chemistry declined by > 50% and was replaced by POCT. Prior to POCT implementation, time to troponin and chemistry had declined steadily due to other improvements in laboratory efficiency. After POCT implementation, there was an immediate 20-minute further decline (p < 0.001) in both time to troponin and time to chemistry results using the propensity-weighted comparisons. However, the declining trend observed prior to POCT implementation did not continue at the same rate after implementation. Similarly, prior to POCT implementation, ED LOS declined due to other quality improvements. After POCT implementation, LOS continued declined at a similar rate. Because of this prior trend, the ITSA did not show a significant decline in LOS attributable to POCT. Common benefits of POCT perceived by staff in qualitative interviews included improved quality of care (64%) and reductions in time to test results (44%). Common challenges included concerns over POCT accuracy (32%) and technical barriers (29%).ConclusionIn the study ED, implementation of POCT was associated with a reduction in time to test result for both troponin and chemistry. Local staff felt that faster time to test result improved quality of care; however, concerns were raised with POCT accuracy.© 2018 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

21 keywords...

hide…