• Cristiane S Oliveira, Anderson José, Crislaine O Santos, Cristiane H Y de Oliveira, Thiago C O Carvalho, Rejane A S de Castro, Jessyca P R Selman, Anderson A de Camargo, and Simone Dal Corso.
• Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidade Nove de Julho, São Paulo/SP, Brazil.
• Respir Care. 2018 Mar 1; 63 (3): 311-318.

IntroductionThe incremental shuttle walk test was initially developed to be carried out in a hallway (ISWT-H) but has been modified to be performed on a treadmill (ISWT-T). However, it is still unknown whether performance on ISWT-H and ISWT-T are similar in patients with bronchiectasis. In this study, we compared the performance, physiological responses, and perception of effort between the ISWT-T with a handrail and ISWT-H for subjects with bronchiectasis. We also sought to estimate and compare the prescription for training intensity with both tests.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional study in which 24 subjects with bronchiectasis were evaluated on 2 different days (24 h apart). Distance walked (m) was compared between the ISWT-H and ISWT-T. A training session was held on a treadmill at 75% of the speed obtained from both tests. The walking distance, oxygen uptake (V̇O2 ), carbon dioxide production (V̇CO2 ), heart rate, and ventilation (V̇E) were measured.ResultsThere was a difference in the walking distance between the ISWT-T and ISWT-H, but physiological responses for V̇O2 , V̇CO2 , heart rate, and V̇E were similar. However, the speed estimated for training was different, as were the V̇O2 , V̇CO2 , and heart rate.ConclusionsThe ISWT-T with handrail and the ISWT-H are not interchangeable in subjects with bronchiectasis. A slower speed of training intensity may occur when the test is performed in a hallway, as originally described, and this may underestimate responses to aerobic training.Copyright © 2018 by Daedalus Enterprises.

24 keywords...

hide…