• Hrvoje Gasparovic, Tomislav Kopjar, Milan Rados, Alan Anticevic, Marko Rados, Branko Malojcic, Visnja Ivancan, Tea Fabijanic, Maja Cikes, Davor Milicic, Vladimir Gasparovic, and Bojan Biocina.
• Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Center Zagreb, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia. Electronic address: hgasparovic@gmail.com.
• J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2019 Apr 1; 157 (4): 1466-1476.e3.

BackgroundNeurological complications after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) reduce quality of life, increase mortality, and inflate resource utilization. The risk of postoperative neurological complications parallels the increasing risk burden of the contemporary patient population. We evaluated the efficacy of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) on inducing neuroprotection.MethodsSeventy patients undergoing first-time CABG were randomly assigned to RIPC or a sham procedure. Structural brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was complemented with functional connectivity MRI to gain a whole-brain global connectivity analysis. Paired neurocognitive and MRI data were acquired pre- and postoperatively. The primary end point was a composite of new ischemic brain lesions and neurocognitive impairment. Secondary end points included brain connectivity profiles, pooled ischemic volumes, and individual components of the primary outcome. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to determine whether a data set followed a normal distribution. The Fisher exact test was used to calculate the measures of association for categorical variables, whereas continuous data were tested with either the Mann-Whitney U test or the Student t test.ResultsThere was no between-group difference in the incidence of the primary end point (9 [27%] in the RIPC group vs 8 [24%] in the control group, odds ratio, 1.17 [95% confidence interval, 0.34-4.06]; P = 1.0). Although RIPC did not reduce the incidence of brain ischemia (8/33 [24%] vs 7/33 [21%]; P = 1.0), the pooled ischemic volume was lower in the RIPC group (157 [interquartile range, 125-231] vs 777 [interquartile range, 564-965] mm3; P = .004). Postoperative neurocognition was marginally superior in the RIPC group as evidenced by a lower absolute number of abnormal neurocognitive tests in the RIPC group (7/99 [7%] vs 16/99 [16%]; odds ratio, 0.40 [95% confidence interval, 0.14-1.09]; P = .074). Robust reductions of functional connectivity profiles for the associative thalamus were documented in both groups, irrespective of RIPC (RIPC group, t = 3.31; P < .01; and the control group, t = 3.52; P < .01).ConclusionsSilent brain ischemia occurs frequently after CABG. RIPC did not reduce the incidence of the primary outcome. However, RIPC significantly reduced the pooled volume of ischemic brain lesions. Surgery adversely affected global brain connectivity, with RIPC conferring no demonstrable protection. The association of RIPC with superior neurocognitive test scores failed to cross the threshold for significance.Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

34 keywords...

hide…