• Lancet · Oct 1991

    Meta Analysis

    Effect of selective decontamination of the digestive tract on respiratory tract infections and mortality in the intensive care unit.

    • C M Vandenbroucke-Grauls and J P Vandenbroucke.
    • Department of Clinical Microbiology, Utrecht University Hospital, The Netherlands.
    • Lancet. 1991 Oct 5; 338 (8771): 859-62.

    AbstractTo assess the effect of selective decontamination of the digestive tract on respiratory tract infections and survival of patients treated in an intensive care unit, we carried out a meta-analysis of clinical studies comparing patients treated with selective decontamination with untreated controls. From eleven trials (1489 patients), differences between observed and expected respiratory tract infections and mortality were compared, and odds ratios (ORs) calculated. Analysis was done according to study design. With respect to the risk for respiratory tract infections, the studies with historical controls and the randomised trials showed a protective effect of selective decontamination. Historical control studies yielded an OR of 0.21 (95% confidence limits [CL] 0.15 to 0.29, p less than 0.05) and randomised trials an OR of 0.12 (95% CL 0.08 to 0.19, p less than 0.05). By contrast, the mortality benefit was less clear. Studies with historical controls and randomised trials showed that mortality was not significantly different between treatment and control patients. The evidence from these studies is at best consistent with a very limited effect of selective decontamination of the digestive tract on survival of patients in the intensive care unit, despite a clear preventive effect on the occurrence of respiratory tract infections.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…