• Injury · Aug 2018

    Proliferative and osteogenic differentiation capacity of mesenchymal stromal cells: Influence of harvesting site and donor age.

    • Wolf Christian Prall, Maximilian Michael Saller, Anna Scheumaier, Timo Tucholski, Sara Taha, Wolfgang Böcker, and Hans Polzer.
    • Experimental Surgery and Regenerative Medicine (ExperiMed), Department of General, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Munich University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Nussbaumstr. 20, 80336 Munich, Germany; Paracelsus Medical University (PMU) Salzburg, Strubergasse 21, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
    • Injury. 2018 Aug 1; 49 (8): 1504-1512.

    AbstractHuman mesenchymal stromal cells (hMSCs) are the cellular source of new bone formation and an essential component of autologous bone grafts. Autologous bone graft harvesting is routinely conducted at the iliac crest, although alternative donor sites with lower complication rates are available. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare hMSCs harvested from the iliac crest and the proximal tibia regarding their proliferative and osteogenic differentiation capacity. Furthermore, we investigated the influence of donor age on these biological properties. HMSCs were isolated from iliac crest or proximal tibia bone grafts of 46 patients. Proliferative capacity was assessed by cumulative population doublings, population doubling time, colony forming units and cell proliferation assays. Osteogenic capacity was assessed by quantification of extracellular calcium deposition and marker gene expression levels. The number of hMSCs per gram harvested tissue was determined. Furthermore, the adipogenic and chondrogenic differentiation capacity were quantified using BODIPY and Safranin Orange staining, respectively. Additional analyses were carried out after grouping young (18-49 years) and aged (≥50 years) donors. HMSCs derived from the proximal tibia featured a comparable proliferative and osteogenic differentiation capacity. No significant differences were found for any analysis conducted, when compared to hMSCs obtained from the iliac crest. Furthermore, no significant differences could be revealed when comparing young and aged donors. This was equally true for hMSCs from both donor sites after comparison within the same age group. Our study demonstrates comparable biological properties of hMSCs derived from both donor sites, the iliac crest and the proximal tibia. Furthermore, aging does not alter proliferative and osteogenic differentiation capacity. Consequently, the proximal tibia should be considered more closely as an alternative donor site in patients of all age groups.Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…