• Bartlomiej Bartkowiak, Ashley M Snyder, Andrew Benjamin, Andrew Schneider, Nicole M Twu, Matthew M Churpek, Kevin K Roggin, and Dana P Edelson.
• Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL.
• Ann. Surg. 2019 Jun 1; 269 (6): 105910631059-1063.

ObjectiveAssess the accuracy of 3 early warning scores for predicting severe adverse events in postoperative inpatients.Summary Of Background DataPostoperative clinical deterioration on inpatient hospital services is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and cost. Early warning scores have been developed to detect inpatient clinical deterioration and trigger rapid response activation, but knowledge regarding the application of early warning scores to postoperative inpatients is limited.MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients hospitalized on the wards after surgical procedures at an urban academic medical center from November, 2008 to January, 2016. The accuracies of the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS), National Early Warning Score (NEWS), and the electronic cardiac arrest risk triage (eCART) score were compared in predicting severe adverse events (ICU transfer, ward cardiac arrest, or ward death) in the postoperative period using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).ResultsOf the 32,537 patient admissions included in the study, 3.8% (n = 1243) experienced a severe adverse outcome after the procedure. The accuracy for predicting the composite outcome was highest for eCART [AUC 0.79 (95% CI: 0.78-0.81)], followed by NEWS [AUC 0.76 (95% CI: 0.75-0.78)], and MEWS [AUC 0.75 (95% CI: 0.73-0.76)]. Of the individual vital signs and labs, maximum respiratory rate was the most predictive (AUC 0.67) and maximum temperature was an inverse predictor (AUC 0.46).ConclusionEarly warning scores are predictive of severe adverse events in postoperative patients. eCART is significantly more accurate in this patient population than both NEWS and MEWS.

20 keywords...

hide…