• Pain physician · Jan 2019

    How Does Self-Efficacy Influence Pain Perception, Postural Stability and Range of Motion in Individuals with Chronic Low Back Pain?

    • Roy La Touche, Monica Grande-Alonso, Paloma Arnes-Prieto, and Alba Paris-Alemany.
    • Departamento de Fisioterapia, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Aravaca, Madrid, Spain; Motion in Brains Research Group, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle; Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Aravaca, Madrid, Spain; Institute of Neuroscience and Craniofacial Pain (INDCRAN). Madrid, Spain; Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research, IdiPAZ. Madrid, Spain.
    • Pain Physician. 2019 Jan 1; 22 (1): E1-E13.

    BackgroundLow back pain (LBP) is the most prevalent musculoskeletal problem among adults. Individuals with chronic LBP (CLBP) can present a psychological disorder and a lack of pain self-efficacy.ObjectivesThe objective of this study was to compare the process of repetition-induced summation of activity-related pain, the lumbar range of motion, and the postural stability of patients with non-specific LBP (NSLBP) based on their level of self-efficacy.Study DesignThis research used a descriptive, cross-sectional study design.MethodsThis research included 60 patients with NSCLBP. Patients were classified as having "high" or "low" self-efficacy based on a median split of scores on the Chronic Pain Self-Efficacy Scale. All patients received a sociodemographic questionnaire, a psychological self-reported measures (Tampa scale of Kinesiophobia; Pain Catastrophizing Scale; Rumination subscale, Magnification subscale; Helplessness subscale; Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire; Fear-Avoidance Belief Questionnaire; Physical Activity subscale; Work subscale); and completed the Temporal Summation Lifting Task, Lumbar Range of Motion, and Multi-Directional Functional Reach Test (MDFRT).ResultsThe results indicated that the low self-efficacy group had a shorter lumbar range of motion and lower postural stability, in addition to greater pain intensity in the temporal summation lifting task, compared with the high self-efficacy group. The analysis showed that the strongest correlation for the high self-efficacy was between fear of movement and the temporal summation lifting task, and greater scores at the psychological questionnaires, compared with the high self-efficacy group (r = 0.711; P < 0.01). The strongest correlations found for the low self-efficacy group, showed a positive relationship between pain catastrophizing and the temporal summation lifting task (r = 0.765; P < 0.01), and a strong negative association between pain catastrophizing for the magnification subscale and lumbar range of motion (r = -0.759; P < 0.01).LimitationsThe results of this study should be interpreted with caution because of its cross-sectional design, and therefore causal relationships cannot be established. A significant limitation of the study is that patients' physical activity levels were not assessed, which could have influenced their ability to perform motor tasks at the perceived difficulty and fear level.ConclusionsThe high self-efficacy group had less pain in the temporal summation lifting task, a greater range of motion, and a greater functional range, in addition to a lower influence of psychological factors.Key WordsLow back pain, chronic pain, self-efficacy, temporal summation, range of motion, postural stability, fear of movement, pain catastrophizing, low back disability.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.