• Lancet neurology · Jan 2019

    Magnetic resonance spectroscopy assessment of brain injury after moderate hypothermia in neonatal encephalopathy: a prospective multicentre cohort study.

    • Peter J Lally, Paolo Montaldo, Vânia Oliveira, Aung Soe, Ravi Swamy, Paul Bassett, Josephine Mendoza, Gaurav Atreja, Ujwal Kariholu, Santosh Pattnayak, Palaniappan Sashikumar, Helen Harizaj, Martin Mitchell, Vijayakumar Ganesh, Sundeep Harigopal, Jennifer Dixon, Philip English, Paul Clarke, Priya Muthukumar, Prakash Satodia, Sarah Wayte, Laurence J Abernethy, Kiran Yajamanyam, Alan Bainbridge, David Price, Angela Huertas, David J Sharp, Vaneet Kalra, Sanjay Chawla, Seetha Shankaran, Sudhin Thayyil, and MARBLE consortium.
    • Centre for Perinatal Neuroscience, Imperial College London, London, UK.
    • Lancet Neurol. 2019 Jan 1; 18 (1): 35-45.

    BackgroundIn neonatal encephalopathy, the clinical manifestations of injury can only be reliably assessed several years after an intervention, complicating early prognostication and rendering trials of promising neuroprotectants slow and expensive. We aimed to determine the accuracy of thalamic proton magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy (MRS) biomarkers as early predictors of the neurodevelopmental abnormalities observed years after neonatal encephalopathy.MethodsWe did a prospective multicentre cohort study across eight neonatal intensive care units in the UK and USA, recruiting term and near-term neonates who received therapeutic hypothermia for neonatal encephalopathy. We excluded infants with life-threatening congenital malformations, syndromic disorders, neurometabolic diseases, or any alternative diagnoses for encephalopathy that were apparent within 6 h of birth. We obtained T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and diffusion-weighted MRI and thalamic proton MRS 4-14 days after birth. Clinical neurodevelopmental tests were done 18-24 months later. The primary outcome was the association between MR biomarkers and an adverse neurodevelopmental outcome, defined as death or moderate or severe disability, measured using a multivariable prognostic model. We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to examine the prognostic accuracy of the individual biomarkers. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01309711.FindingsBetween Jan 29, 2013, and June 25, 2016, we recruited 223 infants who all underwent MRI and MRS at a median age of 7 days (IQR 5-10), with 190 (85%) followed up for neurological examination at a median age of 23 months (20-25). Of those followed up, 31 (16%) had moderate or severe disability, including one death. Multiple logistic regression analysis could not be done because thalamic N-acetylaspartate (NAA) concentration alone accurately predicted an adverse neurodevelopmental outcome (area under the curve [AUC] of 0·99 [95% CI 0·94-1·00]; sensitivity 100% [74-100]; specificity 97% [90-100]; n=82); the models would not converge when any additional variable was examined. The AUC (95% CI) of clinical examination at 6 h (n=190) and at discharge (n=167) were 0·72 (0·65-0·78) and 0·60 (0·53-0·68), respectively, and the AUC of abnormal amplitude integrated EEG at 6 h (n=169) was 0·73 (0·65-0·79). On conventional MRI (n=190), cortical injury had an AUC of 0·67 (0·60-0·73), basal ganglia or thalamic injury had an AUC of 0·81 (0·75-0·87), and abnormal signal in the posterior limb of internal capsule (PLIC) had an AUC of 0·82 (0·76-0·87). Fractional anisotropy of PLIC (n=65) had an AUC of 0·82 (0·76-0·87). MRS metabolite peak-area ratios (n=160) of NAA-creatine (<1·29) had an AUC of 0·79 (0·72-0·85), of NAA-choline had an AUC of 0·74 (0·66-0·80), and of lactate-NAA (>0·22) had an AUC of 0·94 (0·89-0·97).InterpretationThalamic proton MRS measures acquired soon after birth in neonatal encephalopathy had the highest accuracy to predict neurdevelopment 2 years later. These methods could be applied to increase the power of neuroprotection trials while reducing their duration.FundingNational Institute for Health Research UK.Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.