-
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. · Dec 2019
Multicenter Study Comparative StudyTissue versus mechanical aortic valve replacement in younger patients: A multicenter analysis.
- Alexander Iribarne, Bruce J Leavitt, Michael P Robich, Gerald L Sardella, Daniel J Gelb, Yvon R Baribeau, Jock N McCullough, Paul W Weldner, Robert A Clough, Cathy S Ross, David J Malenka, Anthony W DiScipio, and Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group.
- Section of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH. Electronic address: alexander.iribarne@hitchcock.org.
- J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2019 Dec 1; 158 (6): 1529-1538.e2.
ObjectiveThe goal of this study was to examine the long-term survival of patients between the ages of 50 and 65 years who underwent tissue versus mechanical aortic valve replacement (AVR) in a multicenter cohort.MethodsA multicenter, retrospective analysis of all AVR patients (n = 9388) from 1991 to 2015 among 7 medical centers reporting to a prospectively maintained clinical registry was conducted. Inclusion criteria were: patients aged 50 to 65 years who underwent isolated AVR. Baseline comorbidities were balanced using inverse probability weighting for a study cohort of 1449 AVRs: 840 tissue and 609 mechanical. The primary end point of the analysis was all-cause mortality. Secondary end points included in-hospital morbidity, 30-day mortality, length of stay, and risk of reoperation.ResultsDuring the study period, there was a significant shift from mechanical to tissue valves (P < .001). There was no significant difference in major in-hospital morbidity, mortality, or length of hospitalization. Also, there was no significant difference in adjusted 15-year survival between mechanical versus tissue valves (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-1.13; P = .29), although tissue valves were associated with a higher risk of reoperation with a cumulative incidence of 19.1% (95% CI, 14.4%-24.3%) versus 3.0% (95% CI, 1.7%-4.9%) for mechanical valves. The reoperative 30-day mortality rate was 2.4% (n = 2) for the series.ConclusionsAmong patients 50 to 65 years old who underwent AVR, there was no difference in adjusted long-term survival according to prosthesis type, but tissue valves were associated with a higher risk of reoperation.Copyright © 2019 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:

- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.