• Eur J Anaesthesiol · Aug 2019

    Observational Study

    Tidal volume challenge to predict fluid responsiveness in the operating room: A prospective trial on neurosurgical patients undergoing protective ventilation.

    • Antonio Messina, Claudia Montagnini, Gianmaria Cammarota, Silvia De Rosa, Fabiana Giuliani, Lara Muratore, Della Corte Francesco F, Paolo Navalesi, and Maurizio Cecconi.
    • From the Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, IRCCS Humanitas, Humanitas University, Milan (AM, MC), the Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Maggiore della Carità University Hospital, Novara (CM, GC, FG, LM, FDC), the Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza (SDR), and the Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy (PN).
    • Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2019 Aug 1; 36 (8): 583-591.

    BackgroundPulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV) do not predict fluid responsiveness when using a protective ventilation strategy: the use of functional haemodynamic tests can be useful to overcome this limitation.ObjectivesWe tested the use of a tidal volume challenge (VTC), during 6 ml kg [predicted body weight (PBW)] ventilation, and the end-expiratory occlusion test (EEOT) for prediction of fluid responsiveness.DesignAn interventional prospective study.SettingSupine elective neurosurgical patients.InterventionsThe study protocol was, first, the initial EEOT test was performed during baseline 6 ml kg PBW ventilation; second, VTC was performed by increasing the VT up to 8 ml kg PBW and PPV and SVV changes were recorded after 1 min; third, a second EEOT was performed during 8 ml kg PBW ventilation; and VT was reduced back to 6 ml kg PBW and a third EEOT was performed. Finally, a 250 ml fluid challenge was administered over 10 min to identify fluid responders (increase in stroke volume index ≥10%).ResultsIn the 40 patients analysed, PPV and SVV values at baseline and EEOT performed at 6 ml kg PBW did not predict fluid responsiveness. A 13.3% increase in PPV after VTC predicted fluid responsiveness with a sensitivity of 94.7% and a specificity of 76.1%, while a 12.1% increase in SVV after VTC predicted fluid responsiveness with a sensitivity of 78.9% and a specificity of 95.2%. After EEOT performed at 8 ml kg PBW, a 3.6% increase in cardiac index predicted fluid responsiveness with a sensitivity of 89.4% and a specificity of 85.7%, while a 4.7% increase in stroke volume index (SVI) with a sensitivity of 89.4% and a specificity of 85.7%.ConclusionThe changes in PPV and SVV obtained after VTC are reliable and comparable to the changes in CI and SVI obtained after EEOT performed at 8 ml kg PBW in predicting fluid responsiveness in neurosurgical patients.Trial RegistrationACTRN12618000351213.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation  

      Add institutional full text...


    Do you have a pearl, summary or comment to save or share?
    300 characters remaining
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..