• C Ulrich, M Arand, and J Nothwang.
• Trauma Surgery Unit, Klinik am Eichert, Postfach 660, 73006 Göppingen, Germany. christoph.ulrich@kae.de
• Eur Spine J. 2001 Apr 1; 10 (2): 88-100.

AbstractThe decision to opt for a particular internal fixation procedure of a traumatized unstable lower cervical spine should be based on analysis and implementation of scientific and clinical data on the biomechanics of the intact, the unstable and the implant-fixed spine. The following recommendations for surgical stabilization of the lower cervical spine seem, therefore, to be justified. Firstly, the surgical procedure should be to bring about decompression, realignment, and stability. Secondly, the anterior approach should be the primary and preferred one. With regard to surgical and positioning technique, this access clearly involves fewer problems than the posterior approach; if required, unrestricted additional cord decompression can take place; implant fixation is technically simple, and the fusion is under direct compression, thus allowing optimal fusion healing. The awareness of instability and type of implant permits functional therapy, above all for the paraplegic patient. Thirdly, for traumatic conditions, posterior methods should be reserved for exceptional indications. The restriction to this approach is that the anterior column must be intact and a multi-segmental fixation must be used. Posterior fixation seems, therefore, to be more appropriate for degenerative, rheumatoid or tumorous instabilities than for traumatic instabilities. The cerclage wire technique depends on intact osseous posterior elements, while after laminectomy only implants fixed with screws can create safe stability. The disadvantages of the posterior access for the proprioception of the cervical muscles and the subjective symptoms of the patient are known and must be taken into account. Fourthly, combined techniques are indicated for highly unstable or particularly complex injuries. On the cervicothoracic junction, or in cases of Bechterew's disease, the decision is justifiably made in favor of this technique, which can be performed as a one-stage or two-stage operation. Finally, whenever possible, selection of the implant should take into account the foreseeable developments in diagnostic procedures, and therefore, in view of the modern imaging techniques likely to be used in any follow-up examinations required later, the implant chosen should be made of titanium.

14 keywords...

hide…