• Y M Xue, L J Zeng, D W Chen, B C Lai, B F Xu, J Y He, W Wu, and F H Lin.
• The Fourth Department of Intensive Care Unit, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Provincial Clinical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001, China.
• Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018 Aug 21; 98 (31): 2476-2480.

AbstractObjective: To explore whether cephalic artery peak velocity variation during passive leg raising (ΔVpeak(CA)-PLR) could effectively predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated severe sepsis patients with spontaneous breathing. Methods: Total of 38 patients on mechanical ventilation with spontaneous breathing admitted to the Fourth Departments of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of Fujian Provincial Hospital from January to December in 2017 were enrolled.The patients were diagnosed with severe sepsis or sepsis shock.The peak velocity in cephalic artery (Vpeak(CA)) during PLR was measured by bedside portable ultrasonic, and then ΔVpeak(CA)-PLR was calculated.All patients received volume expansion (VE) test and the changes of stroke volume during VE test (ΔSV-VE) were measured.Patients were classified as responsive group or non-responsive group according to the ΔSV-VE increased ≥15% or not after VE test.Furthermore, the sensitivity and specificity of ΔVpeak(CA)-PLR for predicting fluid responsiveness were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.The comparisons between groups were performed with Student's unpaired two-tailed t test, and Pearson's test was used for the correlation analysis. Results: Among the patients, 22 cases responded to VE test and the rest 16 cases did not.There were no significantly differences in age, gender, body mass index, infection site, sepsis-related organ failure assessment score, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ score, ventilator parameters and dose of vasoactive agent between the two groups.The ΔVpeak(CA)-PLR in responsive group was markedly higher than that in non-responsive group (15.7%±4.2% vs 6.9%±4.3%, t=6.240, P<0.05), and the ΔVpeak(CA)-PLR in the responsive group was positively related to the ΔSV-VE (r=0.723, P<0.05). Furthermore, the area of ΔVpeak(CA)-PLR under ROC curve was 0.912.The sensitivity and specificity of ΔVpeak(CA)-PLR≥12.2% to predict fluid responsiveness in the patients with sepsis were 81.8% and 87.5%, respectively. Conclusion: ΔVpeak(CA)-PLR measured by bedside portable ultrasonic can predict the fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated severe sepsis patients with spontaneous breathing, and it can be used to guide further fluid resuscitation.

12 keywords...

hide…