-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Infraclavicular and supraclavicular approaches to brachial plexus for ambulatory elbow surgery: A randomized controlled observer-blinded trial.
- Shalini Dhir, Brigid Brown, Peter Mack, Yves Bureau, Janice Yu, and Douglas Ross.
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, St. Joseph's Health Care, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: shalini.dhir@sjhc.london.on.ca.
- J Clin Anesth. 2018 Aug 1; 48: 67-72.
Study ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of supraclavicular and infraclavicular approaches to brachial plexus block for elbow surgery.DesignProspective, parallel arm, observer-blinded, randomized controlled trial.SettingThis study occurred in a designated block room at St. Joseph's hospital, a large academic tertiary hospital in London, Canada.Patients150 adult ASA class I-III patients undergoing elective ambulatory elbow surgery.InterventionsPatients were randomized to receive either an ultrasound-guided infraclavicular or a supraclavicular block with ropivacaine.MeasurementsBoth groups were assessed for performance and sensory block onset times. Motor block, effective surgical anesthesia, procedure-related pain, axillary nerve block and ulnar nerve sparing were additional outcomes. We analyzed continuous and non-continuous variables with the independent t-test and chi-square test respectively and considered statistical significance when type 1 error was under 0.05.Main ResultsWe observed similar mean block procedure times at 285 (±128) seconds in infra and 307 (±138) seconds in supra group (p = 0.3). The mean time of sensory block onset in both groups was similar: Infra 20.4 (±7.9) and supra 18.9 (±7.1) min (p = 0.4). Conversion to general anesthesia (4.2 vs 5.5%; p = 0.73) and the need for local anesthetic supplement (4.2 vs 4.1%; p = 0.98) was similar in both groups. We observed an increased incidence of paresthesia in the supra group (8.3 vs 23.2%; p = 0.014).ConclusionWe found that both blocks were equally effective for elbow surgery with similar procedure and block onset times and failure rates. Lower incidence of paresthesia was associated with the infraclavicular block with no change in other complications compared to the supraclavicular technique.Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:

- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.