• J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. · Dec 2019

    Comparative Study

    Acquired recipient pulmonary function is better than lost donor pulmonary function in living-donor lobar lung transplantation.

    • Hidenao Kayawake, Toyofumi F Chen-Yoshikawa, Masatsugu Hamaji, Daisuke Nakajima, Akihiro Ohsumi, Akihiro Aoyama, and Hiroshi Date.
    • Department of Thoracic Surgery, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
    • J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2019 Dec 1; 158 (6): 1710-1716.e2.

    ObjectiveIn standard bilateral living-donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT), the right and left lower lobes from 2 healthy donors are implanted in the recipient in place of whole right and left lungs. In other words, total 10 lobes (5 lobes in each donor) are shared by the 2 donors (4 lobes in each donor) and the recipient (2 lobes) in this transplant procedure. This study aimed to compare pulmonary function between donors and recipients before and after LDLLT.MethodsWe performed 76 LDLLT procedures between June 2008 and March 2017. After excluding 12 single LDLLT and 11 native-lung-sparing LDLLT procedures, we identified 38 recipients of bilateral LDLLT who survived >1 year and underwent routine pulmonary function testing. Acquired recipient pulmonary function was compared with lost donor pulmonary function at 1 year post-LDLLT.ResultsThe median age of the 38 recipients was 44 years (range, 8-62 years); 14 were men. The median age of the 76 donors was 41.5 years (range, 20-60 years); 50 were men. One year post-LDLLT, acquired recipient forced vital capacity was significantly greater than lost donor forced vital capacity (1889.5 ± 581.3 mL vs 1073.9 ± 661.6 mL; P < .001). Similarly, acquired recipient forced expiratory volume in 1 second at 1 year post-LDLLT was significantly greater than lost donor forced expiratory volume in 1 second (1646.8 ± 483.0 mL vs 1064.2 ± 534.5 mL; P < .001).ConclusionsThese results indicated that acquired recipient pulmonary function was better than lost donor pulmonary function in bilateral LDLLT.Copyright © 2019 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…