• P Pilkington and A B Gilmore.
• European Centre on Health of Societies in Transition, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. paul.pilkington@uwe.ac.uk
• Tob Control. 2004 Dec 1; 13 (4): 375-8.

Study ObjectiveTo examine the involvement of Philip Morris in Living Tomorrow 2 and determine the rationale behind its involvement.DesignResearch was conducted through a web based search of internal tobacco industry documents made publicly available through litigation.Main ResultsFor approximately 1,000,000 euros Philip Morris (now Altria) became a co-initiator of Living Tomorrow 2, a tourist complex in Belgium that aims to demonstrate how we will be living in the future. In addition to promoting the company and its grocery products, Philip Morris is using the complex and its website to promote ventilation as a means of accommodating smokers and non-smokers in the indoor environment. Particular emphasis was placed on the bar and restaurant areas. Despite the rationale for its involvement, Philip Morris fails to acknowledge its role as a cigarette manufacturer. As a form of corporate sponsorship Philip Morris thought its involvement could evade any European tobacco advertising ban.ConclusionsPhilip Morris is using a tourist attraction to promote its views on control of second hand smoke (SHS) and accommodation of smokers and non-smokers in the indoor environment. However, ventilation does not deal with the health effects of SHS. Policymakers must be cognisant of the devious tactics the industry employs to promote its own agenda, especially in relation to indoor air quality and smoking in public places. Tobacco control legislation should be continually modified and strengthened in response to the changing activities of the tobacco industry as it strives to evade existing legislation and deter the advent of new legislation.

21 keywords...

hide…