• Ann. Intern. Med. · Jun 2018

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    Long-Term Effectiveness of Sigmoidoscopy Screening on Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Women and Men: A Randomized Trial.

    • Øyvind Holme, Magnus Løberg, Mette Kalager, Michael Bretthauer, Miguel A Hernán, Eline Aas, Tor J Eide, Eva Skovlund, Jon Lekven, Jörn Schneede, Kjell Magne Tveit, Morten Vatn, Giske Ursin, Geir Hoff, and NORCCAP Study Group†.
    • Sørlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway, and University of Oslo Institute of Health and Society and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway (Ø.H., M.L., M.B., T.J.E.).
    • Ann. Intern. Med. 2018 Jun 5; 168 (11): 775-782.

    BackgroundThe long-term effects of sigmoidoscopy screening on colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality in women and men are unclear.ObjectiveTo determine the effectiveness of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening after 15 years of follow-up in women and men.DesignRandomized controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00119912).SettingOslo and Telemark County, Norway.ParticipantsAdults aged 50 to 64 years at baseline without prior CRC.InterventionScreening (between 1999 and 2001) with flexible sigmoidoscopy with and without additional fecal blood testing versus no screening. Participants with positive screening results were offered colonoscopy.MeasurementsAge-adjusted CRC incidence and mortality stratified by sex.ResultsOf 98 678 persons, 20 552 were randomly assigned to screening and 78 126 to no screening. Adherence rates were 64.7% in women and 61.4% in men. Median follow-up was 14.8 years. The absolute risks for CRC in women were 1.86% in the screening group and 2.05% in the control group (risk difference, -0.19 percentage point [95% CI, -0.49 to 0.11 percentage point]; HR, 0.92 [CI, 0.79 to 1.07]). In men, the corresponding risks were 1.72% and 2.50%, respectively (risk difference, -0.78 percentage point [CI, -1.08 to -0.48 percentage points]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.66 [CI, 0.57 to 0.78]) (P for heterogeneity = 0.004). The absolute risks for death from CRC in women were 0.60% in the screening group and 0.59% in the control group (risk difference, 0.01 percentage point [CI, -0.16 to 0.18 percentage point]; HR, 1.01 [CI, 0.77 to 1.33]). The corresponding risks for death from CRC in men were 0.49% and 0.81%, respectively (risk difference, -0.33 percentage point [CI, -0.49 to -0.16 percentage point]; HR, 0.63 [CI, 0.47 to 0.83]) (P for heterogeneity = 0.014).LimitationFollow-up through national registries.ConclusionOffering sigmoidoscopy screening in Norway reduced CRC incidence and mortality in men but had little or no effect in women.Primary Funding SourceNorwegian government and Norwegian Cancer Society.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…