-
J Clin Monit Comput · Jul 1998
Case ReportsArtifact mistaken for electrical interference recorded from a pulmonary artery catheter.
- B Kleinman and K Frey.
- Department of Anesthesiology-112A, Edward Hines Jr. VA Medical Center, Hines, IL, USA.
- J Clin Monit Comput. 1998 Jul 1; 14 (5): 361-3.
AbstractArtifactual signals superimposed on the electrocardiogram have been well documented [1-5]. These signals can originate from infusion pumps [1, 2], occlusion heads from cardiopulmonary bypass machines [3,4], and dialysis apparatus [5]. Artifacts on a pulmonary artery tracing, such as those produced by "catheter whip," are well described [6], and rarely if ever confuse the clinician. Extraneous electrical signals are of major concern because they pose a hazard to susceptible patients. We report a case in which the blood pressure tracing from the pulmonary artery revealed an artifact that looked at first glance like 60 cycle alternating current (AC) electrical interference. The investigation as to its origin revealed important lessons in the analysis of human error.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*,_underline_or**bold**. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>and subscript<sub>text</sub>. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3., hyphens-or asterisks*. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com) - Images can be included with:
 - For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote..