• Eur J Pain · Jan 1998

    Scoring the mouse formalin test: validation study.

    • SufkaKJDepartment of Psychology, The University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS, 38677, USA, WatsonGS, NothdurftRE, and MogilJS.
    • Department of Psychology, The University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS, 38677, USA
    • Eur J Pain. 1998 Jan 1; 2 (4): 351-358.

    AbstractThe formalin test is a well-established model for assessing nociceptive processes and analgesic drug effects. Previous studies have provided statistical validation of optimal procedures for conducting and scoring the rat formalin test. In the mouse model, formalin concentration has been subjected to validation studies. The present research extended previous work by subjecting two additional parameters - the behaviors that should be scored and the optimal interval for second-phase formalin response - to empirical validation. Five behavioral (formalin-induced favoring, lifting, and biting/licking, rearing and locomotion) and two physiological measures (paw weight and paw thickness increases reflective of formalin-induced inflammation) were examined under four formalin concentrations (Exp. 1: 0.5, 1.0, 5.0, and 10.0%/25µl formalin) or under four morphine doses (Exp. 2: 0.0, 1.0, 5.0, and 10.0 mg/kg, s.c. with 5% formalin concentration). Multiple regression analyses defined the optimal second-phase formalin response in outbred, Swiss-Webster mice as 15-35 min post formalin injection, and revealed that the second-phase response is best characterized by the cumulative time spent biting/licking the injected paw. Finally, paw physiological measures provided convergent evidence of nociceptive and antinociceptive processes in the mouse formalin test. Copyright 1998European Federation of Chapters of the International Association for the Study of Pain.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.