-
Review Meta Analysis Comparative Study
Clipping versus coiling for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Hui Li, Rui Pan, Hongxuan Wang, Xiaoming Rong, Zi Yin, Daniel P Milgrom, Xiaolei Shi, Yamei Tang, and Ying Peng.
- Department of Neurology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 107, Yan Jiang Xi Rd, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, 510120, China.
- Stroke. 2013 Jan 1; 44 (1): 29-37.
Background And PurposeEndovascular treatment has increasingly been used for aneurismal subarachnoid aneurismal hemorrhage. The aim of this analysis is to assess the current evidence regarding safety and efficiency of clipping compared with coiling.MethodsWe conducted a meta-analysis of studies that compared clipping with coiling between January 1999 and July 2012. Comparison of binary outcomes between treatment groups was described using odds ratios (OR; clip versus coil).ResultsFour randomized controlled trials and 23 observational studies were included. Randomized controlled trials showed that coiling reduced the 1-year unfavorable outcome rate (OR, 1.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-1.76). However, there was no statistical deference in nonrandomized controlled trials (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.96-1.28). Subgroup analysis revealed coiling yielded better outcomes for patients with good preoperative grade (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.24-1.84) than for poor preoperative patients (OR, 0.88; 95% CI 0.56-1.38). Additionally, the incidence of rebleeding is higher after coiling (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.28-0.66), corresponding to a better complete occlusion rate of clipping (OR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.88-3.13). The 1-year mortality showed no significant difference (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.88-1.30). Vasospasm was more common after clipping (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.07-1.91), whereas the ischemic infarct (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.52-1.06), shunt-dependent hydrocephalus (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.66-1.07), and procedural complication rates (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.67-2.11) did not differ significantly between techniques.ConclusionsCoiling yields a better clinical outcome, the benefit being greater in those with a good preoperative grade than those with a poor preoperative grade. However, coiling leads to a greater risk of rebleeding. Well-designed randomized trials with special considerations to the aspect are needed.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:

- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.