• Anaesth Intensive Care · Mar 2012

    The influence of unrestricted use of sugammadex on clinical anaesthetic practice in a tertiary teaching hospital.

    This retrospective audit identified an association between the introduction of unrestricted access to sugammadex and a fall in 'anaesthetic theatre time'. Mean hospital stay was also observed to be 0.8 days shorter after introduction of sugammadex, but was not statistically significant after adjusting for confounders.

    summary
    • R W Watts, J A London, R M A W van Wijk, and Y-L Lui.
    • Department of Anaesthesia, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. richard.watts@health.sa.gov.au
    • Anaesth Intensive Care. 2012 Mar 1;40(2):333-9.

    AbstractThis retrospective casenote audit involving 374 patients requiring intubation for an anaesthetic found that when the availability of sugammadex became unrestricted, its use increased from 7.1 to 65.3% (P <0.0001) of all muscle relaxant reversals, while neostigmine use decreased from 59.6 to 12.5%. Rocuronium use decreased slightly (90.8 to 79.2%, P=0.006) but vecuronium use increased (2.1 to 8.3%, P=0.02). Cisatracurium and suxamethonium use were unchanged. Total rocuronium dose (55.9 ± 24.1 vs 60.4 ± 22.3 mg) and the number of doses (1.9 ± 1.48 to 1.96 ± 1.27) were unchanged, but the time between the last dose and reversal decreased (91.7 ± 68.1 to 62 ± 52.4 minutes, P=0.0002). There appeared to be no change in postoperative nausea and vomiting, or post-anaesthesia care unit time or oxygen saturation levels. Anaesthetic theatre time fell from 143.5 ± 85.8 to 120 ± 71.2 minutes (P=0.01) and remained significant when adjusted for confounding variables (ratio of means 1.17, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.34, P=0.02), although inferences in relation to causality are limited by the retrospective and observational design of the study. Hospital stay also appeared to fall (4.2 ± 3.5 to 3.4 ± 3.0 days, P=0.035), but was not statistically significant when adjusted for confounding variables (ratio of means 1.04, 95% confidence interval 0.89 to 1.2, P=0.59). These observations suggest that the unrestricted availability of sugammadex will change how steroid-based neuromuscular blocking drugs are used and reversed, but further research is needed to determine if patient outcomes will improve.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    This article appears in the collection: Is sugammadex as good as we think?.

    Notes

    summary
    1

    This retrospective audit identified an association between the introduction of unrestricted access to sugammadex and a fall in 'anaesthetic theatre time'. Mean hospital stay was also observed to be 0.8 days shorter after introduction of sugammadex, but was not statistically significant after adjusting for confounders.

    Daniel Jolley  Daniel Jolley
    pearl
    1

    Unrestricted access to sugammadex both increases the use of sugammadex and changes patterns of muscle relaxant drug choice by anaesthetists.

    Daniel Jolley  Daniel Jolley
     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…