• Eur Spine J · Nov 2020

    Cervical spinal computed tomography utilizing model-based iterative reconstruction reduces radiation to an equivalent of three cervical X-rays.

    • Kazutaka Masamoto, Shunsuke Fujibayashi, Bungo Otsuki, Yasuhiro Fukushima, Koji Koizumi, Takayoshi Shimizu, Yu Shimizu, Koichi Murata, Norimasa Ikeda, and Shuichi Matsuda.
    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan. masamoto@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp.
    • Eur Spine J. 2020 Nov 1; 29 (11): 2804-2813.

    PurposeTo evaluate radiation dose and image quality of cervical spinal computed tomography scanned with low-radiation dose (LD-CT) utilizing model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR).MethodsWe retrospectively examined 14 patients (65.5 ± 13.9 years) who underwent both standard-radiation-dose CT (SD-CT) reconstructed with hybrid iterative reconstruction and LD-CT of cervical spine. The radiation dose, objective image quality indicator, which includes signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise, and subjective image quality score of the anatomical landmarks in the SD-CT and LD-CT were statistically compared. In addition, the measurement errors of the length of C3 vertebrae (height, anteroposterior length, inner and outer pedicle diameters) between SD-CT and LD-CT were analyzed.ResultsRadiation dose of LD-CT was reduced to one-sixth of the dose of SD-CT. The objective image quality indicator of LD-CT was significantly better than that of SD-CT. The subjective image quality of LD-CT was relatively worse than that of SD-CT but generally graded as clinically accepted or higher. There was no remarkable difference between SD-CT and LD-CT in the measurement value of height and anteroposterior length. Inner pedicle diameter was significantly (0.21 ± 0.13 mm) smaller, and outer pedicle diameter was (0.24 ± 0.14 mm) larger on LD-CT than on SD-CT.ConclusionCervical spinal LD-CT that utilized MBIR enabled radical decrease in radiation dose and provided sufficient image quality for clinical use. This scanning protocol can be a good alternative for protecting patients from exposure to unnecessary radiation, especially when a patient requires multiple CT scans.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.