• The Journal of pediatrics · Jan 2001

    Review

    Proceedings of a consensus conference for the management of patients with urea cycle disorders.

    • M Summar and M Tuchman.
    • Division of Medical Genetics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
    • J. Pediatr. 2001 Jan 1; 138 (1 Suppl): S6-10.

    AbstractIn an effort to develop standards for the treatment of patients with urea cycle disorders, a consensus conference was held in Washington, DC, from April 27-29, 2000. Conference participants included physicians, scientists, nurses, dieticians, and a genetic counselor, all experts in their various medical fields in these diseases. Representatives from the Food and Drug Administration and the National Urea Cycle Disorders Foundation, a parents support group, also participated in the conference. The goals set forth for the conference were to (1) reach a consensus on diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines for urea cycle disorders with the most up-to-date information and the experience of experts in the field, (2) establish a collaborative network of health care professionals to advance the cause of patients with urea cycle disorders in the areas of clinical management and research, and (3) provide help to health care providers in the recognition and management of these complex disorders by publishing the proceedings of the conference in a widely read journal. The articles that follow this introduction represent the current state of knowledge on the topics addressed in the conference and a summary of the discussions that followed each of the presentations. With input from all the participants, we tried to cover those topics that were believed to be the most relevant both to the experts and to patients. As the reader will appreciate, many unresolved and controversial issues pertaining to treatment have yet to be studied by rigorous scientific methods. On the other hand, there are many issues on which the panel agreed. In many instances the availability of reliable information on the respective topics determined whether consensus could be reached.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…