Circulation
-
Review Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Routine medical management of acute myocardial infarction. Lessons from overviews of recent randomized controlled trials.
In recent years, several large randomized trials have clarified the role of various interventions in acute myocardial infarction. There is clear evidence that thrombolytic therapy, aspirin, and beta-blockers reduce mortality. Both aspirin and beta-blockers also reduce reinfarction and stroke. ⋯ Heparin increases the risk of hemorrhagic complications twofold. Although trials of vasodilators conducted before the widespread use of thrombolytic therapy and aspirin have been promising, newer trials are needed to evaluate their effects among patients receiving these agents. The aggregate of all trials of the routine use of calcium antagonists or antiarrhythmic agents indicates that these agents do not improve survival.
-
All thrombolytic agents convert plasminogen to plasmin, either directly, as in the case of urokinase, saruplase, and alteplase, or indirectly, as in the case of streptokinase. In the majority of recent clinical trials with streptokinase, a high-dose (0.7-1.5 million units), brief-duration (30-90 minutes) drug regimen has been used. After a mean interval of 4.2 hours from onset of chest pain to intravenous infusion of streptokinase, repeat angiography performed 60-90 minutes after the start of thrombolytic treatment gave a reperfusion rate of 43%; the corresponding figures for anistreplase, saruplase, and alteplase are 56%, 67%, and 69%. ⋯ In a large trial in 5,011 patients with acute myocardial infarction, stroke occurred in 1.1% of alteplase-treated patients compared with 1.0% in placebo-treated controls. Haunting problems are residual stenosis of the coronary artery and reocclusion. Urgent angioplasty does not seem to be the right answer; more effective antithrombotic strategies have yet to be developed.