Brain, behavior and evolution
-
Evolution has generated mammalian brains that vary by a factor of over 100,000 in mass. Despite such tremendous diversity, brain scaling in mammalian evolution has tacitly been considered a homogeneous phenomenon in terms of numbers of neurons, neuronal density, and the ratio between glial and neuronal cells, with brains of different sizes viewed as similarly scaled-up or scaled-down versions of a shared basic plan. According to this traditional view, larger brains would have more neurons, smaller neuronal densities (and, hence, larger neurons), and larger glia/neuron ratios than smaller brains. ⋯ Strikingly, all brains appear to gain nonneuronal cells in a similar fashion, with relatively constant nonneuronal cell densities. As a result, while brain size can no longer be considered a proxy for the number of brain neurons across mammalian brains in general, it is actually a very good proxy for the number of nonneuronal cells in the brain. Together, these data point to developmental mechanisms that underlie evolutionary changes in brain size in mammals: while the rules that determine how neurons are added to the brain during development have been largely free to vary in mammalian evolution across clades, the rules that determine how other cells are added in development have been mostly constrained and to this day remain largely similar both across brain structures and across mammalian groups.
-
Review Comparative Study
Modulating the modulators: parasites, neuromodulators and host behavioral change.
Neuromodulators can resculpt neural circuits, giving an animal the behavioral flexibility it needs to survive in a complex changing world. This ability, however, provides parasites with a potential mechanism for manipulating host behavior. This paper reviews three invertebrate host-parasite systems to examine whether parasites can change host behavior by secreting neuromodulators. ⋯ For example, parasites may induce the host's immune system to produce the appropriate neuromodulators. In many parasites, the ability to manipulate host behavior may have evolved from adaptations designed to circumvent the host's immune system. Immune-neural-behavioral connections may be pre-adapted for parasitic manipulation.
-
The general features of the olfactory system are remarkably consistent across vertebrates. A phylogenetic analysis of central olfactory projections indicates that at least three distinct olfactory subsystems may be broadly present in vertebrates and that a fourth, the accessory olfactory or vomeronasal system, arose in tetrapods. The origin and function of the vomeronasal system have been the subject of much controversy, but some conclusions can be drawn. ⋯ A phylogenetic analysis of the distribution of olfactory receptor cell types indicates that microvillar olfactory receptor cells are widespread among vertebrates and are not restricted to aquatic animals or to the vomeronasal epithelium of tetrapods. Previous suggestions that all microvillar receptor cells are specialized for the detection of pheromones are not tenable. Attempts to recognize features of the olfactory system that are common to all vertebrates and might be specialized for the detection of pheromones vs. more general odorants, or for the detection of water-borne vs. air-borne odorants, are not supported by current evidence.
-
The command concept is the prevalent explanation for initiation of behavioral acts. We review the theory and methods used to show the existence of neurons mediating command function according to a major approach, which we call the Command Neuron Experiment (CNE). The CNE claims that command neurons are the cause of, or are necessary and sufficient for, the execution of behavioral acts. ⋯ These themes readily lead to false-positive or false-negative conclusions when its operational procedures are applied. We conclude that this concept must be abandoned. In a companion paper we propose a re-formulation of command as a dynamic system property that is intermediate to neurophysiological and behavioral contexts and independent of methods, structures, or preconceived causal schemes.