The Annals of occupational hygiene
-
Respirator fit testing is necessary before entering hazardous working environments to ensure that the respirator, when worn, satisfies a minimum fit and that the wearer knows when the respirator fits properly. In the many countries that do not have fit testing or total inward leakage regulations (including Korea), however, many workers wearing respirators may be potentially exposed to hazardous environments. It is necessary to suggest a useful tool to provide an alternative for fit testing in these countries. ⋯ The Series 7500 Medium is more limited in providing adequate fit for females at specific facial dimensions than for males. For adequate fitting performance, the SK-6 is not preferentially recommended for Korean male and female workers due to low GMFFs and pass proportions. The result of this study indicates that after more accurate studies are performed, facial size categories, on the basis of facial dimensions, could be a useful tool to assist in the selection of adequately fitting respirators for workers in the countries having no fit testing requirements.
-
A commercially available computational fluid dynamic (CFD) software program, specific for HVAC systems, was used to study the performance of an aerodynamic fume cupboard. The numerical results showed good qualitative agreement with physical measurements giving confidence in the CFD model to simulate and predict overall fume cupboard performance. However, there were some quantitative differences specifically around 'aerodynamic' features that could not be accurately simulated by the software code. ⋯ The computer model was used to simulate the gas tracer containment test method described in BS 7258 (1994) [Laboratory Fume Cupboards], and had a much greater sensitivity than the recommended physical measuring instruments. The results given in this paper demonstrate the potential for using a commercially available software package for the optimisation of fume cupboard design and testing. It also indicates the economy of using CFD compared with building a prototype and testing a model.