The Journal of hand surgery, European volume
-
J Hand Surg Eur Vol · Feb 2018
Meta AnalysisFunctional outcomes of distal radius fractures with and without ulnar styloid fractures: a meta-analysis.
The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the functional outcomes of patients with a distal radius fracture with and without a concomitant fracture of the ulnar styloid process. A systematic literature search was performed to identify all studies comparing patients with a distal radius fracture with and without an ulnar styloid process fracture. The initial search revealed 511 articles, of which 12 articles with a total of 2243 patients were included; 1196 patients with and 1047 patients without an ulnar styloid process fracture. ⋯ This difference is less than 10 and therefore not clinically important. No significant difference was found in Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation scores, range of motion, grip strength, visual analogue scale pain scores, ulnar-sided wrist pain and distal radio-ulnar joint instability between patients with and without an ulnar styloid process fracture after 1 year of follow-up. Moreover, no significant differences were found between ulnar styloid base and nonbase fractures.
-
J Hand Surg Eur Vol · Feb 2018
Meta Analysis Comparative StudyPercutaneous pinning versus volar locking plate internal fixation for unstable distal radius fractures: a meta-analysis.
This meta-analysis compared outcomes between percutaneous pinning/wiring and open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) with locking plates for treatment of unstable distal radius fractures. Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar were searched through December 30, 2015. Twenty randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised two-arm studies were included. ⋯ Supination and grip strength were better with ORIF. Radiographically, ulnar variation was greater with pinning/wiring. These results suggest that ORIF/plating is the preferred method of managing unstable distal radius fractures.
-
J Hand Surg Eur Vol · Jun 2016
Meta AnalysisIs intramedullary nailing better than the use of volar locking plates for fractures of the distal radius? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared the use of intramedullary nails and volar locking plates in distal radial fractures. PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Collaboration Central database were used to find randomized controlled trials that met the eligibility criteria. Two reviewers screened the studies, extracted the data, evaluated the methodological quality and analysed the data with RevMan 5.1 software. No statistically significant differences were detected in the disability of the arm, shoulder and hand and the Gartland and Werley scores, radiographic parameters, wrist range of motion, grip strength, total complication rate and incidence of tendon rupture between the two groups. However, carpal tunnel syndrome occurred less often after intramedullary nailing. The two fixation methods achieved equal clinical, functional and radiological outcomes for primary fixation of the indicated types of distal radial fractures. ⋯ Therapeutic/LevelI.
-
J Hand Surg Eur Vol · Nov 2011
Review Meta AnalysisA systematic review of the treatment of acute fractures of the scaphoid.
A systematic review of the literature identified eight trials comparing surgery with cast treatment and found no significant difference in pain, tenderness, cost, functional outcome or patient satisfaction. In the group treated surgically, the rate of non-union was three times less, there was a quicker return to function and grip strength and range of movement was also transiently better. There were, however, more complications among those treated surgically. No significant differences were reported in the two trials that compared above and below elbow casts or the trial that compared scaphoid and Colles' casts.
-
J Hand Surg Eur Vol · Oct 2006
Review Randomized Controlled Trial Meta AnalysisA comparison of traditional digital blocks and single subcutaneous palmar injection blocks at the base of the finger and a meta-analysis of the digital block trials.
A randomised, double-blinded, controlled trial was performed to compare traditional digital blocks with single subcutaneous palmar injection blocks at the base of the finger. A search for randomised controlled trials of digital blocks through MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and CBM was conducted and a meta-analysis including the current trial was performed. ⋯ The meta-analysis suggests that traditional digital blocks and single subcutaneous palmar injection blocks are similar with regard to injection pain and are less painful than the transthecal digital block. The palmar techniques, including single subcutaneous palmar block and transthecal block, carry a risk of not anaesthetising the dorsum of the digit adequately, particularly the dorsum of the thumb and the proximal phalanx of the fingers.