The American journal of cardiology
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Differences between local investigator and core laboratory interpretation of the admission electrocardiogram in patients with unstable angina pectoris or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (a Thrombin Inhibition in Myocardial Ischemia [TRIM] substudy).
The present study compares the on-site interpretation of an admission electrocardiogram (ECG) with core laboratory results in a large, multicenter trial of 516 patients diagnosed with unstable angina pectoris or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. The local investigators evaluated the admission ECG regarding ST-T changes before the ECGs were sent to the core laboratory for blinded interpretation. The strength of agreement between the observations was described by kappa statistics. ⋯ Independent variables, including peak creatine kinase-MB and 30-day outcome, were more closely related to core laboratory results than the local investigator's interpretation of the admission ECG. Thus, in the present study, considerable differences were demonstrated between the on-site interpretation of the admission ECG and the blinded evaluation performed in the core laboratory regarding relatively simple electrocardiographic variables. The results suggest that more widespread use of independent evaluation of clinical data should be incorporated in future clinical trials.