Injury
-
In carpal scaphoid fractures, the surgical treatment with screw is considered the gold standard; shape memory staple however presents substantial advantages. The authors report a study on unstable fractures of the scaphoid waist (type B1, B2, B5, according to Herbert classification) treated with shape memory staple on a large sample of patients, with the aim to confirm the usefulness of this method, the quality of reduction and fixation, the functional results, the time of union and the possible complications. ⋯ Consolidation was achieved in all cases of primary fractures (0-30 days) within three months after surgery, and within eight months in all but two cases of delayed unions (operated within 6 months of the injury). Pain was absent at follow-up in 79% of cases, never severe or unbearable, the average flexion-extension range achieved was 112°. Handgrip strength values were comparable to those of contralateral wrist in 75% of cases. Mean time lost at work was 7.4 weeks. No algo-distrophy or malunion were observed. Discussion CONCLUSIONS: Scaphoid waist fractures' treatment with shape memory staple should be considered as an excellent alternative to screw fixation.
-
This prospective study aims to describe our experience in the management of transverse patellar fractures in elderly patients with minimally invasive osteosynthesis technique (MIOT), at 12-months follow-up. ⋯ This prospective study shows that MIOT is a safe option for treatment of patellar transverse fractures in elderly patients, since it reduces the intra-operative blood loss, shortens the operating time, and is endowed with lower rates of postoperative complications.
-
Percutaneous cementoplasty (PC) has been widely used for the stabilization of impending fractures of the proximal femur due to metastatic lesions. Augmented percataneous cementoplasty (APC) with fixation devices aims to improve mechanical consolidation and stability of the construct. However, the clinical benefit of the combined technique has not been clearly established. The purpose of the current review was to compare the efficacy between APC and PC for impending pathologic proximal femoral fractures from metastatic malignancy, in terms of pain relief, operative time and fracture related complication rates. ⋯ APC does not seem to improve pain relief, fracture incidence, and operative time when compared with PC. Both techniques appeared effective in terms of resolution of symptoms, prevention of pathologic fractures, and early facilitation of weight-bearing. PC showed more clinical safety, as no major systemic complications occurred. However, due to the relative paucity of large clinical trials, the decision of augmentation of cementoplasty should be individualized according to the size and location of metastatic lesions and the overall medical condition of patients.