The journal of trauma and acute care surgery
-
J Trauma Acute Care Surg · Jul 2013
Multicenter Study Comparative StudyDiluting the benefits of hemostatic resuscitation: a multi-institutional analysis.
Although minimization of crystalloids is a widely adopted practice in the resuscitation of patients with severe hemorrhage, its direct impact on high-ratio resuscitation (HRR) outcomes has not been analyzed. We hypothesize that HRR patients will have worse outcomes from crystalloid use. ⋯ Therapeutic study, level IV.
-
J Trauma Acute Care Surg · Jul 2013
Multicenter Study Comparative StudyEvaluation of the risk of noncontiguous fractures of the spine in blunt trauma.
There is significant debate over the risk of additional noncontiguous (NC) fractures among blunt trauma patients with an identified spinal column injury, often prompting routine full-spine imaging. We sought to determine the incidence of NC spinal fractures and the relationship between injury pattern and mechanism. ⋯ Spine fractures are relatively common with blunt trauma, and approximately 20% of patients with a spinal column fracture will have an NC fracture. NC fractures were associated with other severe injuries and should be mainly suspected and investigated in high-velocity mechanisms.
-
J Trauma Acute Care Surg · Jul 2013
Multicenter StudyWaiver of consent in noninterventional, observational emergency research: the PROMMTT experience.
In the PRospective Observational Multicenter Major Trauma Transfusion (PROMMTT) study, waiver of consent was used because previous literature reported low response rates and subsequent bias. The goal of this article was to examine the rationale and tradeoffs of using waiver of consent in PROMMTT. ⋯ Waiver of consent was used in PROMMTT because of the potential adverse impact of consent refusals; however, there were no refusals. If the IRB for Site 8 had required withdrawal of patients unable to consent and destruction of their data, a serious bias would likely have been introduced. Other tradeoffs included a reduction in sites participating in residual blood collection and a smaller than expected amount of residual blood collected among sites operating under a waiver of consent. Noninterventional emergency research studies should consider these potential tradeoffs carefully before deciding whether waiver of consent would best achieve the goals of a study.
-
There are few clinical data to guide the use of cryoprecipitate in severely injured trauma patients. Cryoprecipitate is a rich source of fibrinogen and has been associated with improved survival in animal as well as limited human studies. Our objectives were to identify patterns and predictors of cryoprecipitate use and determine whether transfusing cryoprecipitate was associated with improved survival. ⋯ Ten US Level 1 trauma centers vary greatly in their timing and use of cryoprecipitate in severely injured trauma patients. We could not identify any association of cryoprecipitate use with in-hospital mortality, although most patients did not receive this product. Randomized controlled studies are needed to determine if cryoprecipitate (or fibrinogen concentrates) have a beneficial effect.
-
J Trauma Acute Care Surg · Jul 2013
Multicenter StudyTime-dependent prediction and evaluation of variable importance using superlearning in high-dimensional clinical data.
Prediction of outcome after injury is fraught with uncertainty and statistically beset by misspecified models. Single-time point regression only gives prediction and inference at one time, of dubious value for continuous prediction of ongoing bleeding. New statistical machine learning techniques such as SuperLearner (SL) exist to make superior prediction at iterative time points while evaluating the changing relative importance of each measured variable on an outcome. This then can provide continuously changing prediction of outcome and evaluation of which clinical variables likely drive a particular outcome. ⋯ The SL technique for prediction of outcome from a complex dynamic multivariate data set is superior at each time interval to standard models. In addition, the SL VIM at each time point provides insight into the time-specific drivers of future outcome, patient trajectory, and targets for clinical intervention. Thus, this automated approach mimics clinical practice, changing form and content through time to optimize the accuracy of the prognosis based on the evolving trajectory of the patient.