Anesthesiology
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Meta Analysis Clinical Trial
Is low-dose haloperidol a useful antiemetic?: A meta-analysis of published and unpublished randomized trials.
The antiemetic efficacy of haloperidol was studied using data from 15 published (1962-1988) and 8 unpublished randomized trials; 1,397 adults received haloperidol, and 1,071 were controls. Settings were postoperative nausea or vomiting (1,994 patients), gastroenterology (261), chemotherapy (189), and radiation therapy (24). The relative benefit to prevent postoperative nausea or vomiting during 24 h with 0.5-4 mg haloperidol compared with placebo was 1.26-1.51 (number needed to treat, 3.2-5.1), without evidence of dose responsiveness; 0.25 mg was not antiemetic. ⋯ There were no reports on cardiac toxicity. Postoperatively and in gastroenterology, haloperidol is antiemetic, with minimal toxicity. For other clinical settings and for children, valid data are unavailable.
-
Ambulatory surgery is growing in popularity worldwide. For example, 50-70% of surgical procedures in North America are performed on an ambulatory basis. Use of Bispectral Index (BIS) monitoring for titration of general anesthesia may allow use of less anesthetics, reduction in side effects, and faster patient recovery. ⋯ The use of BIS monitoring modestly reduced anesthetic consumption, risk of nausea and vomiting, and recovery room time. These benefits did not reduce time spent in the ambulatory surgery unit, and cost of the BIS electrode exceeded any cost savings.
-
Meta Analysis Comparative Study
Effects of perioperative central neuraxial analgesia on outcome after coronary artery bypass surgery: a meta-analysis.
Perioperative central neuraxial analgesia may improve outcome after coronary artery bypass surgery due to attenuation of stress response and superior analgesia. ⋯ There were no differences in the rates of mortality or myocardial infarction after coronary artery bypass grafting with central neuraxial analgesia. There were associated improvements in faster time until tracheal extubation, decreased pulmonary complications and cardiac dysrhythmias, and reduced pain scores.
-
Meta Analysis
Labor analgesia and cesarean delivery: an individual patient meta-analysis of nulliparous women.
The authors performed an individual patient meta-analysis of 2,703 nulliparous women who were randomized to either epidural analgesia or intravenous opioids for pain relief during labor from five trials conducted at their hospital. The primary purpose in this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of epidural analgesia during labor on the rate of cesarean delivery. ⋯ Epidural analgesia compared to intravenous meperidine analgesia during labor does not increase the number of cesarean deliveries.
-
There is a belief that clonidine may be effective in reducing perioperative myocardial ischemic events, although the results of several trials are conflicting. The aim of the current study was to provide a systematic review of randomized controlled trials that tested the efficacy of clonidine in this regard. ⋯ The meta-analysis suggests that perioperative clonidine reduces cardiac ischemic episodes in patients with known, or at risk of, coronary arterial disease without increasing the incidence of bradycardia. Therefore, these findings strongly justify planning and execution of a definitive study seeking the benefits of clonidine.