Anesthesiology
-
Comparative Study
Premedication with oral dexmedetomidine alters hemodynamic actions of intravenous anesthetic agents in chronically instrumented dogs.
Dexmedetomidine (the D-stereoisomer of medetomidine), a highly selective alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist, has been demonstrated to produce analgesia and sedation and attenuate hemodynamic responses to emergence from inhalational anesthetics, which suggests a potential use for this drug as a premedicant for general anesthesia. The authors examined hemodynamic interactions between dexmedetomidine and three commonly used intravenous anesthetic agents with markedly different hemodynamic effects. Conscious, chronically instrumented dogs received intravenous induction doses of ketamine, propofol, or etomidate, followed by continuous infusions of each drug at four different doses for 15-min intervals on different days. ⋯ However, ketamine significantly reduced left ventricular dP/dt50 compared to control in dogs premedicated with dexmedetomidine. Except for a significant reduction in systemic vascular resistance, dexmedetomidine did not significantly affect the hemodynamic response to induction of anesthesia with propofol. Similarly, dexmedetomidine did little to alter the hemodynamic response to induction of anesthesia with etomidate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Comparative Study
Effects of sevoflurane and isoflurane on hepatic circulation in the chronically instrumented dog.
To compare the effects of sevoflurane and isoflurane on hepatic circulation, eighteen dogs were chronically instrumented for measurements of mean aortic blood pressure and cardiac output and for simultaneous measurements of hepatic and portal blood flows. Each animal was studied while awake and during 1.2 and 2 MAC of either isoflurane or sevoflurane. Both anesthetics induced tachycardia and a dose-dependent decrease in mean aortic blood pressure (isoflurane -27% and -39%; sevoflurane -22% and -37%). ⋯ During isoflurane, the only significant change was a decrease in portal blood flow (-16%) at 1.2 MAC. Neither anesthetic significantly changed renal blood flow. Therefore, both anesthetics led to similar systemic and hepatic vasodilation.
-
Comparative Study
Prolongation of spinal anesthesia. Differential action of a lipid drug carrier on tetracaine, lidocaine, and procaine.
This study evaluates prolongation of spinal anesthesia by incorporating local anesthetics in lipid formulation. The duration and intensity of local anesthetic effect produced by different concentrations of procaine (1%, 2%, 4%), lidocaine (1%, 2%, 4%), or tetracaine (0.5%, 1%, 2%) dissolved in normal saline were compared to those produced by the same concentration of drugs in lipid (iophendylate) solution. Fifty rabbits with chronic indwelling subarachnoid catheters were divided into ten equal groups. ⋯ Our data show that iophendylate preparations of local anesthetics produce prolonged but less intense motor blockade than the aqueous solutions, except for tetracaine 0.5% in iophendylate, which produced shorter duration of motor blockade. The reduced intensity of motor blockade may be explained by decreased availability of local anesthetic at the nerve tissue due to storage of drug in the lipid depot. The increased duration of blockade signifies a sustained release of drug from the depot.