Anesthesiology
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Pharmacodynamics of high-dose vecuronium in children during balanced anesthesia.
To compare the speed of onset, intubating conditions, duration of action, and recovery from neuromuscular blockade with vecuronium to those with succinylcholine, 40 ASA physical status 1 or 2 children (ages 2-9 yr) were studied during N2O-O2-opioid anesthesia. Each child was randomly assigned to receive a bolus dose of one of the following muscle relaxants: succinylcholine 2.0 mg/kg (n = 10), vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg (n = 10), vecuronium 0.2 mg/kg (n = 10), or vecuronium 0.4 mg/kg (n = 10). The evoked electromyogram of the abductor digiti minimi to train-of-four stimulation was monitored. ⋯ The intubating conditions were excellent in 100% of patients. The duration of action was least with succinylcholine (5.7 +/- 1.5 min) and increased with increasing doses of vecuronium: 0.1 mg/kg, 23.9 +/- 5.1 min; 0.2 mg/kg, 55.2 +/- 11.6 min; and 0.4 mg/kg, 74.6 +/- 9.9 min, respectively (P less than 0.001). The recovery index was most rapid with succinylcholine (1.6 +/- 0.4 min) and was slowest with vecuronium 0.4 mg/kg (22.6 +/- 2.1 min) (P less than 0.005).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Comparative Study Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical Trial
A comparison of ropivacaine 0.5% and bupivacaine 0.5% for brachial plexus block.
This study compared the effectiveness of 0.5% ropivacaine and 0.5% bupivacaine for brachial plexus block. Forty-eight patients received a subclavian perivascular brachial plexus block for upper-extremity surgery. One group (n = 24) received ropivacaine 0.5% (175 mg) and a second group (n = 24) received bupivacaine 0.5% (175 mg), both without epinephrine. ⋯ Motor block was profound, with shoulder paralysis as well as hand paresis developing in all of the patients in both groups. Two patients in each group required supplemental blocks before surgery. Ropivacaine 0.5% and bupivacaine 0.5% appeared equally effective in providing brachial plexus anesthesia.
-
Five healthy, nonpregnant volunteers were studied before and after induction of lumbar epidural anesthesia to determine the cause of central hypothermia during epidural anesthesia. Cutaneous heat loss was measured from 10 area-weighted sites using thermal flux transducers. Oxygen consumption was measured and converted to heat production in watts (W). ⋯ Analysis of the tremor patterns suggests that oscillations recorded during epidural anesthesia in nonpregnant individuals is normal thermoregulatory shivering. Shivering occurred sooner and was more intense during iced saline infusion than during epidural anesthesia, despite comparable central hypothermia. The low intensity of shivering during epidural anesthesia, and in some individuals the delay in onset, may result from blockade of afferent cutaneous cold signals.