Anesthesiology
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Dexmedetomidine premedication attenuates ketamine-induced cardiostimulatory effects and postanesthetic delirium.
Dexmedetomidine is a new potent and highly selective alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist with sedative-hypnotic and anesthetic sparing properties. Because of its sympathoinhibitory activity, it may prove useful in balancing the cardiostimulatory effects and attenuating the adverse central nervous system effects of ketamine. ⋯ These results suggest that premedication with 2.5 micrograms/kg dexmedetomidine is effective in attenuating the cardiostimulatory and postanesthetic delirium effects of ketamine. However, because of its propensity to cause bradycardia, routine use of an anticholinergic drug should be considered.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Increasing mean skin temperature linearly reduces the core-temperature thresholds for vasoconstriction and shivering in humans.
The contribution of mean skin temperature to the thresholds for sweating and active precapillary vasodilation has been evaluated in numerous human studies. In contrast, the contribution of skin temperature to the control of cold responses such as arteriovenous shunt vasoconstriction and shivering is less well established. Accordingly, the authors tested the hypothesis that mean skin and core temperatures are linearly related at the vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds in men. Because the relation between skin and core temperatures might vary by gender, the cutaneous contribution to thermoregulatory control also was determined in women. ⋯ These data indicate that skin and core temperatures contribute linearly to the control of vasoconstriction and shivering in men and that the cutaneous contributions average approximately 20% in both men and women. The same coefficients thus can be used to compensate for experimental skin temperature manipulations in men and women. However, the cutaneous contributions to each response vary among volunteers; furthermore, the contributions to the two responses vary within volunteers.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Oral clonidine premedication blunts the heart rate response to intravenous atropine in awake children.
Clonidine, which is known to have analgesic and sedative properties, has recently been shown to be an effective preanesthetic medication in children. The drug may cause side effects, including bradycardia and hypotension. This study was conducted to evaluate the ability of intravenous atropine to increase the heart rate (HR) in awake children receiving clonidine preanesthetic medication. ⋯ Oral clonidine premedication (4 micrograms.kg-1) blunted the increase in HR after intravenous atropine in awake children, although clonidine 2 micrograms.kg-1 did not. A larger dose of atropine was required to increase the HR by 20 beats.min-1 in children receiving the premedicant in the larger dose.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Effects of fentanyl on sympathetic activation associated with the administration of desflurane.
Activation of the sympathetic nervous system occurs when desflurane is inspired shortly after anesthetic induction and when the inspired concentration of desflurane is rapidly increased during steady-state periods of anesthesia. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness and dose response of fentanyl pretreatment in attenuating the neurocirculatory responses to desflurane in healthy human volunteers. ⋯ The administration of desflurane was associated with increases in SNA, HR, MAP, and CVP. Maximum sympathetic activation and hemodynamic responses occurred 4-5 min after initiating desflurane during induction and 2-3 min after increasing the inspired concentration of desflurane during the "transition" period. Although fentanyl partially attenuated the hemodynamic component in a dose-dependent fashion during the "transition" period, it did not significantly diminish the response during induction.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Does spinal anesthesia result in a more complete sympathetic block than that from epidural anesthesia?
Spinal and epidural injection of local anesthetics are used to produce sympathetic block to diagnose and treat certain chronic pain syndromes. It is not clear whether either form of regional anesthesia produces a complete sympathetic block. Spinal anesthesia using tetracaine has been reported to produce a decrease in plasma catecholamine concentrations. This has not been demonstrated for epidural anesthesia in humans with level of anesthesia below C8. One possible explanation is that spinal anesthesia results in a more complete sympathetic block than epidural anesthesia. To examine this question, a cross-over study was performed in young, healthy volunteers. ⋯ Spinal anesthesia did not result in a more complete attenuation of the sympathetic response to a CPT than did epidural anesthesia. In response to the CPT, spinal anesthesia blocked the increase in cardiac index, and epidural anesthesia resulted in a decrease in total peripheral resistance compared to the pre-anesthesia state. The differences between the techniques are not significant and are of uncertain clinical implications.