Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 1993
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialAccelerated onset and delayed recovery of neuromuscular block induced by mivacurium preceded by pancuronium in children.
The goal of this study was to describe a technique which could shorten the time from mivacurium administration to peak neuromuscular block (NMB) after administration of the maximum recommended dose of mivacurium. Forty-eight pediatric patients were randomized into three groups and studied during nitrous oxide-alfentanil-thiopental anesthesia. Every patient received two blinded injections 3 min apart: either 15 micrograms/kg of pancuronium in 1 mL of saline followed by 170 or 200 micrograms/kg of mivacurium or saline followed by 200 micrograms/kg of mivacurium. ⋯ Time from injection to 90% NMB averaged 116 (SEM 11) s after administration of 200 micrograms/kg of mivacurium, and 71 (7) s and 94 (11) s when 200 micrograms/kg or 170 micrograms/kg of mivacurium, respectively, was preceded by pancuronium (P = 0.0095). Mean times from injection to recovery of neuromuscular function to > 25% of baseline (T25) and to train-of-four ratio of 0.75 were 9.1 (0.7) and 15.8 (1.2) min, respectively, after administration of 200 micrograms/kg of mivacurium alone. T25 and train-of-four of 0.75 occurred significantly later at 21.9 (1.8) and 35.0 (2.8) min, respectively (P = 0.0001), when 200 micrograms/kg of mivacurium was preceded by 15 micrograms/kg of pancuronium.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 1993
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialEffects of alfentanil on the hemodynamic and catecholamine response to tracheal intubation.
A randomized, placebo-controlled study was conducted in 60 ASA Class I, II, and III patients to determine the dose response of alfentanil in moderating the cardiovascular and catecholamine response to tracheal intubation (INT). Patients were randomly allocated into one of four groups to receive either 15 micrograms/kg alfentanil (A15), 30 micrograms/kg alfentanil (A30), 45 micrograms/kg alfentanil (A45), or normal saline (control), given intravenously (i.v.) before induction of anesthesia. One minute after administration of 4.0 mg/kg thiopental and 1.5 mg/kg succinylcholine i.v., tracheal intubation was performed using direct laryngoscopy. ⋯ In the control group, epinephrine and norepinephrine serum concentrations increased by 152 +/- 52% and 58 +/- 62%, respectively, following INT (different from A30 and A45, P < 0.05). However, up to a dose of 30 micrograms/kg (A30), a dose-dependent decrease in the maximum percent changes of both epinephrine and norepinephrine occurred in response to INT. A larger dose of alfentanil was no more efficacious as the catecholamine response to tracheal intubation was not significantly different when comparing the A45 and A30 groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 1993
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialEffects of ketorolac on postoperative analgesia and ventilatory function after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Ketorolac, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, is alleged to produce postoperative analgesia without opioid-related side effects. Patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were assigned randomly to receive either ketorolac or a placebo (saline) according to a double-blind protocol. Preoperative (baseline) pulmonary function was evaluated using a Respiradyne II monitor. ⋯ In the ketorolac group, only values of forced expiratory volume at 1 s and forced expiratory flow at 25%-75% of the forced vital capacity at 4 h after the operation were significantly higher than those in the saline group (P < 0.05). Incidences of nausea (45% vs 52%) and vomiting (10% vs 10%) were similar in both groups. In conclusion, ketorolac decreased the postoperative requirement for opioid analgesic medication.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 1993
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialDesflurane versus propofol anesthesia: a comparative analysis in outpatients.
This study compares the induction, hemodynamic, and recovery characteristics of a general anesthetic with desflurane to one with propofol. Sixty outpatients presenting for orthopedic surgery received either a propofol induction of anesthesia followed by desflurane and nitrous oxide (Group 1), a propofol induction followed by propofol infusion and nitrous oxide (Group 2), a desflurane and nitrous oxide induction and maintenance (Group 3), or a desflurane induction and maintenance (Group 4). The quality of induction was inferior in Groups 3 and 4 with more breath-holding and excitation than in Groups 1 and 2. ⋯ Although there was no difference between the groups in postoperative narcotic requirement, more patients in Group 3 vomited (50%) than in either Group 2 (0%) or Group 4 (12.5%). Hemodynamically, the anesthetics were very similar. Although desflurane was a difficult drug to use for induction of anesthesia, this study demonstrates that desflurane is a suitable maintenance anesthetic for ambulatory surgery because it provides a rapid awakening and an intermediate recovery similar to propofol.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 1993
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialPupillary response to noxious stimulation during isoflurane and propofol anesthesia.
We studied the effects of noxious stimuli on arterial blood pressure, heart rate, pupil size, and the pupillary light reflex in 13 volunteers anesthetized with either isoflurane or propofol. Those given isoflurane (n = 8) were anesthetized twice, in a randomly selected order, once at an end-tidal concentration of 0.8% and once at 1.2%. An intense noxious stimulus was provided by electrical stimulation applied to skin of the abdominal wall (65-70 mA, 100 Hz). ⋯ During one propofol anesthetic, an esmolol infusion (100 micrograms.kg-1 x min-1) was started 10 min before stimulation to determine whether this agent would blunt the pupillary response. The pupillary light reflex increased more than 200% during both propofol anesthetics with or without esmolol; once again, heart rate and blood pressure changed little. We conclude that with these experimental conditions, the pupil is a more sensitive measure of noxious stimulation than the commonly used variables of arterial blood pressure and heart rate.