Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialAttenuation of cardiovascular responses to tracheal extubation: comparison of verapamil, lidocaine, and verapamil-lidocaine combination.
We recently showed that verapamil attenuated hemodynamic responses to tracheal extubation. The aim of the current study was to compare the efficacy of a combination of intravenous (I.V.) verapamil (0.1 mg/kg) and I.V. lidocaine (1 mg/kg) with that of each drug alone in suppressing the cardiovascular changes during tracheal extubation and emergence from anesthesia. One hundred adult patients (ASA physical status I) who were to undergo elective minor surgery were randomly assigned to one of four groups (n = 25 each): Group S = saline plus saline (control), Group V = verapamil 0.1 mg/kg I.V. plus saline, Group L = lidocaine 1 mg/kg I.V. plus saline, and Group V-L = verapamil 0.1 mg/kg I.V. plus lidocaine 1 mg/kg I.V. These medications were given 2 min before tracheal extubation. Anesthesia was maintained with 1.0%-2.0% sevoflurane and 60% nitrous oxide (N2O) in oxygen. Muscle relaxation was achieved with vecuronium, and a residual neuromuscular blockade was reversed with neostigmine 0.05 mg/kg (combined with atropine 0.02 mg/kg). Changes in heart rate (HR) and arterial blood pressure (AP) were measured during and after tracheal extubation. In the control group, the HR and systolic and diastolic AP increased significantly during tracheal extubation. Verapamil, lidocaine, and their combination attenuated the increases in these variables. The beneficial effect was the greatest with the combination of verapamil and lidocaine. These findings suggest that verapamil 0.1 mg/kg and lidocaine 1 mg/kg given I.V. concomitantly 2 min before tracheal extubation is a simple and more effective prophylaxis than verapamil or lidocaine alone for attenuating the cardiovascular changes associated with tracheal extubation. ⋯ Tachycardia and hypertension associated with tracheal extubation, which may lead to myocardial ischemia, represent a potential risk for patients with coronary arterial disease. To seek effective pharmacological prophylaxis against these complications, we compared the attenuation of hemodynamic changes among verapamil, lidocaine, and a verapamil/lidocaine combination using ASA physical status I patients and found the combination to be effective.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialThe effects of inhaled nitric oxide and its combination with intravenous almitrine on Pao2 during one-lung ventilation in patients undergoing thoracoscopic procedures.
The aim of this study was to assess whether hypoxemia during one-lung ventilation (OLV) can be prevented by inhaled nitric oxide (NO) (Part I) or by its combination with intravenous (IV) almitrine (Part II) in 40 patients undergoing thoracoscopic procedures. In Part I, 20 patients were divided into two groups: one received O2 (Group 1) and one received O2/NO (Group 2). In Part II, 20 patients were divided into two groups: one received O2 (Group 3) and one received O2/NO/almitrine (Group 4). In Groups 2 and 4, NO (20 ppm) was administered during the entire period of OLV, and almitrine was continuously infused (16 microg x kg(-1) x min[-1]) in Group 4. Arterial blood gases were measured during two-lung ventilation with patients in the supine position, after positioning in the lateral decubitus position, and then every 5 min for a 30-min period during OLV. During OLV, Pao2 values decreased similarly in Groups 1 and 2. After 30 min of OLV, the mean Pao2 values in Groups 1 and 2 were 132 +/- 14 mm Hg (mean +/- sem) and 149 +/- 27 mm Hg (not significant [NS]), and the Pao2 value was less than 100 mm Hg in four patients in Group 1 and five patients in Group 2. Pao2 values were greater in Group 4 than in Group 3 after 15 and 30 min of OLV. After 30 min of OLV, the mean Pao2 values were 146 +/- 16 mm Hg in Group 3 and 408 +/- 33 mm Hg in Group 4 (P < 0.001). Pao2 was less than 100 mm Hg during OLV (NS) in four patients in Group 3 and in no patient in Group 4. We conclude that NO inhalation alone has no effect on Pao2 evolution during OLV, although its combination with IV almitrine limits the decrease of Pao2 during OLV. This beneficial effect of NO/almitrine could be attributed to an improvement in ventilation-perfusion relationships. ⋯ Decrease in oxygenation during one-lung ventilation is quite common. Our study showed that inhaled nitric oxide alone did not influence Pao2 evolution. We then tried adding intravenous almitrine to nitric oxide with amazingly good results on Pao2. This nonventilatory technique should be of great use during special thoracic acts, such as thoracoscopic procedures.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical TrialA randomized, blind comparison of remifentanil and alfentanil during anesthesia for outpatient surgery.
We compared remifentanil, an esterase-metabolized opioid, with alfentanil as part of balanced anesthesia with at least 0.8% isoflurane during outpatient surgery in a randomized, double-blind trial. One hundred two patients received remifentanil, and 99 patients received alfentanil. Patients who received remifentanil experienced significantly fewer stress responses to surgical stimuli (52.9% and 65.7%, P < 0.05); significantly fewer remifentanil patients responded to skin closure (11% and 22%, P < 0.05) than patients who received alfentanil. Significantly more patients in the alfentanil group required extra analgesia compared with the remifentanil group (P < 0.05). Time to respond to verbal command was shorter for alfentanil than remifentanil (median 7 min vs 9 min), and times to spontaneous respiration (median 5 min vs 8 min), adequate respiratory rate (median 6 min vs 9 min), and tracheal extubation (median 6 min vs 9 min) were significantly shorter for alfentanil in comparison with remifentanil (P < 0.05). Remifentanil patients, however, showed significantly better recovery of psychomotor and psychometric function between 30 and 90 min after surgery (P < 0.05). The incidences of hypotension intraoperatively and shivering postoperatively were significantly higher with remifentanil. No unexpected or serious adverse events were recorded with remifentanil; however, one patient who received alfentanil experienced severe recurrent respiratory depression after surgery. The metabolic profile of remifentanil allowed better intraoperative analgesia without compromising recovery. ⋯ The pharmacological profile of remifentanil, a new opioid for use in anesthesia, suggests that rapid recovery will occur after its use. This study of 200 outpatients shows that the differences suggested from kinetic studies are not always borne out in clinical practice, although later recovery variables did, in fact, favor remifentanil.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialTranexamic acid is effective in decreasing postoperative bleeding and transfusions in primary coronary artery bypass operations: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
We evaluated the effects of tranexamic acid (TA) administered before and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of adult patients undergoing primary coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Patients received placebo (n = 30) or TA 15 mg/kg before CPB, followed by a TA infusion of 1 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1) for 5 h (n = 30) or TA 15 mg/kg after CPB, followed by a TA infusion of 1 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1) for 5 h (n = 30). Demographic, medical, surgical, laboratory, mediastinal chest tube drainage (MCTD), hemoglobin loss, transfusion, and outcome data were collected. Allogenic blood product administration was tightly controlled. The demographic, medical, and surgical characteristics were similar in all three groups. The median postoperative MCTD and hemoglobin loss in the pre-CPB TA group (710 mL, 8.6 g) was significantly less (P < 0.001) compared with the control (1202 mL, 44.2 g) and post-CPB TA groups (1020 mL, 23.4 g). The percentage of patients who received no allogenic blood products was 27% for the pre-CPB TA group and 33% for the post-CPB TA group (not significant). These percentages were significantly lower than those in the placebo group (66%, P < 0.001). The median number of allogenic blood products administered to the pre-CPB TA group (0 units) was significantly less compared with the control group (4.5 units). The thromboelastogram and fibrinogen split product levels in the pre-CPB TA group indicated better platelet function and less activation of the fibrinolytic system compared with the other two groups (P < 0.05). There were no intergroup differences in reoperation, myocardial infarction, stroke, infections, or death. These data support the use of pre-CPB TA to decrease patient exposure to postcardiopulmonary bypass allogenic blood products. ⋯ In this randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we investigated the efficacy of tranexamic acid to decrease bleeding and blood transfusions after open-heart operations. Tranexamic acid administered before and during the operation was effective in decreasing both bleeding and transfusions. When tranexamic acid was administered immediately after the operation, it had a minor beneficial effect.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA comparative efficacy study of hyperbaric 5% lidocaine and 1.5% lidocaine for spinal anesthesia.
We compared the clinical efficacy of 1.5% lidocaine in dextrose 7.5% in water, which is currently available as a commercial preparation but approved for use only in obstetrical patients, with the traditional 5% lidocaine in dextrose 7.5% in water for spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing lower abdominal procedures. Fifty-one male patients scheduled to undergo inguinal herniorrhaphy were randomly divided into two groups based on the spinal anesthetic received: Group I received 1.5% lidocaine in dextrose 7.5% in water, and Group II received 5% lidocaine in dextrose 7.5% in water. After intrathecal injection of the anesthetic, each patient was evaluated for the speed of onset, the time to recovery, and the quality of the surgical anesthesia and motor block that ensued by an anesthesiologist blinded to the technique. With the exception of the patients in Group I, who achieved a higher dermatome level of sensory analgesia, we were unable to demonstrate any significant clinical differences between the two lidocaine solutions. Our results indicate that lidocaine 1.5% in dextrose 7.5% in water is clinically indistinguishable from the 5% solution as a spinal anesthetic for lower abdominal surgery. ⋯ In this study, two concentrations of lidocaine are compared as spinal anesthetics in 51 male patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair. Patients were assessed for the onset, quality, and duration of the spinal block. The study results indicate that 1.5% lidocaine is as effective as the 5% solution as a spinal anesthetic for patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair.