Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Dec 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialSevoflurane or halothane anesthesia: can we tell the difference?
This study was performed to evaluate the ability of anesthesiologists to differentiate between sevoflurane, a newer, more expensive anesthetic, and halothane. A total of 113 assessments were made by 36 anesthesiologists on 58 children, aged 6 mo to 6 yr, scheduled for bilateral myringotomy and tube placement. All patients received midazolam (0.5 mg/kg per os) approximately 30 min before the induction of anesthesia. Sevoflurane or halothane was randomly selected for anesthetic induction and maintenance. The anesthesiologists, who were unaware of the anesthetic being used, were asked to identify the anesthetic based on clinical signs and to assess the quality of induction, speed of induction, and speed of emergence using a visual analog scale (VAS; minimum score = 0, maximum score = 100). The anesthesiologists correctly identified the anesthetic only 56.6% of the time. This was not significantly different from the 50% that would result from random guessing (P = 0.08). Further, there were no significant differences in VAS scores between the two groups. This study suggests that in premedicated pediatric patients undergoing brief surgical procedures, anesthesiologists cannot correctly differentiate between sevoflurane and halothane. The lack of significant differences in VAS scores suggests that the speed of induction, the speed of emergence, and the quality of induction are similar under these clinical conditions. Any purported benefits of sevoflurane seem to be of minor consequence under the circumstances studied. ⋯ When the anesthetic halothane or sevoflurane is administered in a blind, randomized fashion, anesthesiologists could not reliably identify which drug was being used to anesthetize children for a brief surgical procedure. These results suggest that the differences between the two drugs in clinical practice are small and may not justify the additional cost of sevoflurane.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Dec 1997
Meta AnalysisDrugs to minimize perioperative blood loss in cardiac surgery: meta-analyses using perioperative blood transfusion as the outcome. The International Study of Peri-operative Transfusion (ISPOT) Investigators.
Concern about the side effects of allogeneic red blood cell transfusion has increased interest in methods of minimizing perioperative transfusion. We performed meta-analyses of randomized trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of aprotinin, desmopressin, tranexamic acid, and epsilon-aminocaproic acid in cardiac surgery. All identified randomized trials in cardiac surgery were included in the meta-analyses. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who received at least one perioperative allogeneic red cell transfusion. Sixty studies were included in the meta-analyses. The largest number of patients (5808) was available for the meta-analysis of aprotinin, which significantly decreased exposure to allogeneic blood (odds ratio [OR] 0.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-0.39; P < 0.0001). The efficacy of aprotinin was not significantly different regardless of the type of surgery (primary or reoperation), aspirin use, or reported transfusion threshold. The use of aprotinin was associated with a significant decrease in the need for reoperation because of bleeding (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.27-0.73; P = 0.001). Desmopressin was not effective, with an OR of 0.98 (95% CI 0.64-1.50; P = 0.92). Tranexamic acid significantly decreased the proportion of patients transfused (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.34-0.76; P = 0.0009). Epsilon-aminocaproic acid did not have a statistically significant effect on the proportion of patients transfused (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.04-1.12; P = 0.07). There were not enough patients to exclude a small but clinically important increase in myocardial infarction or other side effects for any of the medications. We conclude that aprotinin and tranexamic acid, but not desmopressin, decrease the number of patients exposed to perioperative allogeneic transfusions in association with cardiac surgery. ⋯ Aprotinin, desmopressin, tranexamic acid, and epsilon-aminocaproic acid are used in cardiac surgery in an attempt to decrease the proportion of patients requiring blood transfusion. This meta-analysis of all published randomized trials provides a good estimate of the efficacy of these medications and is useful in guiding clinical practice. We conclude that aprotinin and tranexamic acid, but not desmopressin, decrease the exposure of patients to allogeneic blood transfusion perioperatively in relationship to cardiac surgery.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Dec 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialContribution of the spinal cord to arousal from inhaled anesthesia: comparison of epidural and intravenous fentanyl on awakening concentration of isoflurane.
To investigate the contribution of modulation of afferent nociceptive inputs by an opioid in the spinal cord to arousal from inhaled anesthesia, we determined the awakening concentration of isoflurane in 50 unpremedicated patients scheduled for abdominal hysterectomy. Patients were assigned randomly to three groups. Group I received bolus injections of both epidural and intravenous (I.V.) saline, followed by both epidural and I.V. infusions at the rate of 0.2 mL x kg(-1) h(-1). Group II received an I.V. injection of fentanyl 2 microg/kg, followed by an infusion at the rate of 25 ng x kg(-1) x min(-1), and Group III received an epidural injection and infusion in the same administration regimen as Group II. Anesthesia was induced with and maintained by isoflurane in an air/oxygen mixture (fraction of inspired oxygen = 0.5) with no adjuvant drugs. The study drug was administered at the start of retroperitoneal suturing. The awakening concentrations of isoflurane in Groups I, II, and III (mean +/- SD) were 0.32% +/- 0.07%, 0.31% +/- 0.06%, and 0.24% +/- 0.06%, respectively. At that time, plasma fentanyl concentrations in Groups II and III were 1.12 +/- 0.09 ng/mL and 0.65 +/- 0.04 ng/mL, respectively. Epidural fentanyl infusion reduced the awakening concentration of isoflurane more (P < 0.01) than I.V. fentanyl infusion, despite the lower plasma concentration (P < 0.01) in the epidural group. These findings suggest that epidural fentanyl delays arousal from inhaled anesthesia by modulating the afferent nociceptive inputs in the spinal cord. The spinal cord may contribute to arousal from inhaled anesthesia through the regulation of afferent inputs by opioids along with the supraspinal region of the central nervous system (CNS), even if the effects of subarachnoid fentanyl on the higher CNS via the cephalad migration is taken into consideration. ⋯ The present study revealed that the spinal cord, the lower level of central nervous system, contributed to arousal from general anesthesia, along with the higher central nervous system, by comparing the concentrations of an inhaled anesthetic, isoflurane, in the expiration of patients receiving systemic or regional administration of an opioid, fentanyl.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Dec 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialLate-onset preemptive analgesia associated with preincisional large-dose alfentanil.
Few studies using systemic opioids have been adequately designed to demonstrate a preemptive effect. We investigated the preemptive effect of intraoperative large-dose intravenous (I.V.) opioids over a 72-h period after lower abdominal surgery. Thirty-eight ASA physical status I or II patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy were studied in a prospective, randomized, double-blind design. Group PRE received alfentanil 70 microg/kg over 10 min before surgical incision; Group POST received alfentanil 70 microg/kg over 10 min after incision. Patients received no other intraoperative opioid. Pain was treated in the recovery room with 2-mg I.V. boluses of morphine and was subsequently managed via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) using morphine sulfate. Visual analog scale pain scores at rest (VAS-R) and on movement (VAS-M) and PCA morphine consumption were recorded for 72 hours. VAS-M and VAS-R scores did not differ at any point, and morphine consumption was similar in both groups over the initial 48 h. Group PRE used significantly less morphine from 48 to 72 h postoperatively (P < 0.02). We conclude that presurgical incisional (i.e., compared with postincisional) large-dose opioid exposure results in a modest, late decrease in postoperative morphine consumption, with no clinical impact on early postoperative pain. Timing of the observed reduction coincides with maximal output of substances implicated in experimental hyperalgesia. ⋯ When given before surgical incision, alfentanil, a short-acting narcotic, was associated with a reduction in morphine requirements 48-72 h after surgery. Brief interventions may have a delayed and sustained impact on pain perception, possibly by reducing mechanisms of sensitization.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Dec 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe effects of epsilon-aminocaproic acid on fibrinolysis and thrombin generation during cardiac surgery.
Despite the efficacy of antifibrinolytic drugs in reducing bleeding after cardiac surgery, concerns remain regarding their potential to promote thrombosis. We examined the effect of the antifibrinolytic drug, epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA) on fibrinolysis and thrombin generation during cardiac surgery. Forty-one adults undergoing primary coronary artery bypass graft surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) were prospectively randomized in a double-blind trial to receive either saline or EACA. A loading dose of 150 mg/kg EACA was given before anesthetic induction, followed by a 15 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1) infusion, which continued until 3 h after CPB. Plasma samples for the measurement of D-dimer, thrombin-antithrombin III, and soluble fibrin were obtained before surgery, 1 h on CPB, and 3 and 20 h after CPB. In the EACA group, fibrinolytic activity, as measured by D-dimer, was significantly decreased 3 h after CPB, (0.51 +/- 0.15 mg/L vs 1.13 +/- 0.14 mg/L, P < 0.005). Decreased fibrinolytic activity was accompanied by decreased bleeding in the EACA group (660 +/- 127 mL vs 931 +/- 113 mL, P < 0.05). No differences in the generation of thrombin or soluble fibrin were apparent between the two groups. Suppression of fibrinolytic activity in the absence of concomitant reductions in thrombin generation suggests that EACA could potentiate a hypercoagulable prethrombotic state in the perioperative setting. ⋯ In a randomized, prospective trial of primary cardiac surgery, we demonstrated that the synthetic antifibrinolytic drug epsilon-aminocaproic acid suppresses fibrinolysis with no effects on thrombin generation. These results suggest the potential for synthetic antifibrinolytic drugs to induce a hypercoagulable prethrombotic state in the perioperative setting.