Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Apr 1997
Comparative StudyPostoperative nausea and vomiting: a comparative survey of the attitudes, perceptions, and practice of Swiss anesthesiologists and surgeons.
Managing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) depends on awareness of the problem, the therapeutic measures available, and effective implementation control systems. We mailed 616 PONV questionnaires to all 129 Swiss hospitals with anesthesiological and surgical departments. The responses [192 (31%) completed questionnaires from 87 (67%) hospitals] are representative of Swiss hospital anesthesiologists and surgeons. ⋯ The limited therapeutic efficacy of antiemetics is a concern. PONV management needs standardization, organization, consensus, and research. Better audits and visibility in patients' charts could further improve the quality of PONV management.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Apr 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialPatient-controlled epidural analgesia: interactions between nalbuphine and hydromorphone.
Epidural opioid analgesia can offer advantages over intravenous administration, however, opioid-related side effects are common after epidural administration. We studied the effect of adding nalbuphine (NB), an opioid agonist-antagonist, to hydromorphone (HM) for patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) in 78 healthy women after elective cesarean delivery. Patients were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups. ⋯ Although the overall incidences of nausea (19%-35%) and pruritus (32%-62%) were similar in all four groups, the addition of NB decreased the need for bladder catheterization. The highest NB concentration resulted in increased PCA demands during the 32-h study period. In conclusion, the combination of HM 0.075 mg/mL and NB 0.04 mg/mL resulted in lower nausea scores and a decreased incidence of urinary retention compared with HM alone, without increasing the opioid analgesic requirement.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Apr 1997
Patient and surgeon satisfaction with extremity blockade for surgery in remote locations.
In a practice that may be unique to military health care, extremity nerve blocks are established by anesthesiologists before transporting the patient to a remote clinic for surgery without further monitoring by anesthesia personnel. The safety and acceptance of this practice was assessed through a prospective survey of the surgeons and their patients. Six hundred seventy-seven blocks were performed in a 1-yr period with no adverse events related to this practice. ⋯ Of the responding patients, 78% stated that they would be willing to undergo a repeat block. The surgeons were satisfied with the operating conditions in 96% of the cases. This study supports the safety and efficacy of this practice.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Apr 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical TrialA multicenter study of bispectral electroencephalogram analysis for monitoring anesthetic effect.
Bispectral analysis (BIS) of the electroencephalogram (EEG) has been shown in retrospective studies to predict whether patients will move in response to skin incision. This prospective multicenter study was designed to evaluate the real-time utility of BIS in predicting movement response to skin incision using a variety of general anesthetic techniques. Three hundred patients from seven study sites received an anesthetic regimen expected to give an approximately 50% movement response at skin incision. ⋯ When drugs such as propofol or isoflurane are used as the primary anesthetic, changes in BIS correlate with the probability of response to skin incision. When opioid analgesics are used, the correlation to patient movement becomes much less significant, so that patients with apparently "light" EEG profiles may not move or otherwise respond to incision. Therefore, the adjunctive use of opioid analgesics confounds the use of BIS as a measure of anesthetic adequacy when movement response to skin incision is used as the primary end point.