Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialDesflurane and isoflurane produce similar alterations in systemic and pulmonary hemodynamics and arterial oxygenation in patients undergoing one-lung ventilation during thoracotomy.
We tested the hypothesis that desflurane (DES) and isoflurane (ISO) produce similar effects on systemic and pulmonary hemodynamics and arterial oxygenation before, during, and after one-lung ventilation (OLV) in patients undergoing thoracotomy. After obtaining informed consent, anesthesia was induced with sodium thiopental or thiamylal, fentanyl, and vecuronium in 61 ASA physical status II-IV patients. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either DES (n = 30) or ISO (n = 31) in 100% O2 in separate groups. Hemodynamic data (radial and pulmonary artery [PA] catheters) were recorded, and blood gas values were obtained before and after induction; at selected intervals before, during, and after OLV; and before emergence. DES significantly (P < 0.05) increased heart rate (HR) and decreased mean arterial pressure (MAP) and cardiac output (CO). PA pressures and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) increased; systemic vascular resistance (SVR) was unchanged. Increases in HR and CO and decreases in MAP and SVR occurred during OLV and DES. Reductions in PaO2 (411 +/- 88 to 271 +/- 131 mm Hg 5 min after beginning OLV; mean +/- SD) and content (CaO2) and increases in shunt fraction (Qs/Qt; 0.25 +/- 0.12 to 0.40 +/- 0.19 at 5 min after beginning OLV) were also observed. ISO increased HR and PA pressures but did not alter MAP, CO, and PVR, in contrast to the findings with DES. Reductions in MAP and SVR and increases in CO and PA pressures were observed during OLV in the presence of ISO. Similar to the findings during DES, decreases in PaO2 and CaO2 and increases in Qs/Qt occurred during OLV and ISO. We conclude that DES and ISO produce very similar alterations in systemic and pulmonary hemodynamics and arterial oxygenation in patients undergoing OLV during thoracotomy. ⋯ Desflurane and isoflurane produce similar cardiovascular and pulmonary effects before, during, and after one-lung ventilation in patients undergoing lung surgery.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA comparison of the disposable versus the reusable laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed adult patients.
A disposable (polyvinyl chloride) laryngeal mask airway (LMA) with dimensions identical to, but physical properties different from (stiffer tube/thicker cuff), the reusable (silicone) LMA has recently become available. We performed a randomized, cross-over study of 60 paralyzed, anesthetized patients to test the hypothesis that the use of these devices was different in terms of ease of insertion, airway sealing pressure, fiberoptic position, and changes in intracuff pressure during N2O anesthesia. We also tested the hypothesis that the airway sealing pressure of the LMA is suboptimal if the cuff is inflated to a high intracuff pressure. Both the devices were inserted into each patient in random order, and their performance was assessed at two intracuff pressures (60 and 180 cm H2O) by a blind observer. Subsequently, intracuff pressures were measured during N2O anesthesia for the second device. Ease of insertion was similar: there was no difference in first attempt success rates (97% vs 98%) and insertion times (15 vs 13 s) for the disposable and reusable LMA, respectively. There were no differences in airway sealing pressure or fiberoptic position. Airway sealing pressure was significantly higher at 60 cm H2O intracuff pressure compared with the airway sealing pressure at 180 cm H2O for both devices (P < 0.02). During N2O anesthesia, the intracuff pressure remained stable for the disposable LMA but increased significantly for the reusable LMA. We conclude that the disposable and reusable LMAs perform similarly in paralyzed adult patients, but that the disposable LMA has more stable intracuff pressures during N2O anesthesia. Inflation of the LMA to high intracuff pressures produces a suboptimal seal. ⋯ This randomized, single-blind, within-patient study of 60 adult patients shows that the disposable (polyvinyl chloride) and reusable (silicone) laryngeal mask airways perform similarly, but that the disposable laryngeal mask airway has more stable intracuff pressures during N2O anesthesia. Inflation of either device to high intracuff pressures produces a suboptimal seal.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialCryoanalgesia: effect on postherniorrhaphy pain.
Cryoanalgesia versus sham treatment was applied to the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves after mesh repair of an inguinal hernia under local anesthesia in 48 male patients in a prospective, randomized, and observer- and patient-blinded trial. Pain was scored daily during rest, while coughing, and during mobilization to the sitting position for 1 wk and weekly for 8 wk on a four-point verbal rank scale. Use of supplementary analgesics and sensory disturbances were recorded. Assessments were made for allodynia, hyperalgesia, and mechanical pain detection thresholds 8 wk postoperatively. Cumulative pain scores for the first postoperative week were equal in the two groups, as was the use of analgesics. Eight weeks postoperatively, three cases of hyperalgesia to pinprick were detected in the cryoanalgesia group, and 10 patients in the cryoanalgesia group versus 5 in the sham-treatment group reported disturbed sensibility. We conclude that cryoanalgesia of the iliohypogastrical and ilioinguinal nerve does not decrease postherniorrhaphy pain. ⋯ Does freezing of sensory nerves in the groin reduce pain after hernia repair? Extreme cold (-60 degrees C) was applied in a double-blind, randomized study. No difference in pain scores was found. Sensory disturbances were seen in treatment and control patients. Freezing cannot be recommended for pain relief after hernia repair.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialSingle-dose tropisetron for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting after breast surgery.
In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we compared the efficacy of tropisetron 5 mg with tropisetron 2 mg for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after breast surgery. One hundred forty-eight female patients were randomized to receive either tropisetron 5 mg (n = 49), tropisetron 2 mg (n = 49), or saline (n = 50) before the induction of anesthesia with thiopental and morphine. Anesthesia was maintained with nitrous oxide and isoflurane. Postoperative analgesia was provided by patient-controlled analgesia with i.v. morphine. The incidence of PONV, the pain score, and the analgesic requirement were recorded for 48 h. There was no difference among groups in patient characteristics, risk factors for PONV, morphine consumption, or side effects. During the first 6 h postoperatively, the incidence of PONV after tropisetron 2 mg and 5 mg were similar and were superior to placebo (P < 0.001). After 6 h, the incidence of PONV increased significantly in patients who had received tropisetron 2 mg (P = 0.01) and was greater than that in patients who had received tropisetron 5 mg (P = 0.001). We conclude that single-dose tropisetron 5 mg is more effective than tropisetron 2 mg in the prevention of PONV after breast surgery. ⋯ Breast surgery is associated with a high incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. A single dose of i.v. tropisetron 5 mg is well tolerated and decreases the number of vomiting and nausea episodes after surgery.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialNeuromuscular effects of rocuronium during sevoflurane, isoflurane, and intravenous anesthesia.
The potency and time course of action of rocuronium were studied in patients anesthetized with 66% nitrous oxide in oxygen and 1.5 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration of sevoflurane or isoflurane, or a propofol infusion. Potency was estimated by using the single-bolus technique. Neuromuscular block was measured by stimulation of the ulnar nerve and by recording the force of contraction of the adductor pollicis muscle. The mean (95% confidence limits) of the 50% and 95% effective doses were estimated tobe 142 (129-157) and 265 (233-301) microg/ kg, 165 (146-187) and 324 (265-396) microg/kg, and 183 (163-207) and 398 (316-502) microg/kg during sevoflurane, isoflurane, and propofol anesthesia, respectively (P < 0.05 for sevoflurane versus propofol). The mean +/- SD times to onset of maximal block after rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg were 0.96 +/- 0.16, 0.90 +/- 0.16, and 1.02 +/- 0.15 min during sevoflurane, isoflurane, and propofol anesthesia, respectively. The respective times to recovery of the first response in the train-of-four (TOF) stimulation (T1) to 25% and 90% were 45 +/- 13.1 and 83 +/- 29.3 min, 35 +/- 6.1 and 56 +/- 15.9 min, and 35 +/- 9.2 and 55 +/- 19.4 min. The times to recovery of the TOF ratio to 0.8 were 103 +/- 30.7, 69 +/- 20.4, and 62 +/- 21.1 min, and the 25%-75% recovery indices were 26 +/- 11.7, 12 +/- 5.0, and 14 +/- 6.9 min, respectively. There were no differences among groups in the times for onset of action or to recovery of T1 to 25%. However, the times for recovery of T1 to 90%, TOF ratio to 0.8, and recovery index in the sevoflurane group were all significantly longer compared with the other two groups (P < 0.05, < 0.01, and < 0.01, respectively). We conclude that the effects of rocuronium, especially duration of action, are significantly enhanced during sevoflurane compared with isoflurane and propofol anesthesia. ⋯ In routine clinical use, the effects of rocuronium are enhanced by sevoflurane, in comparison with isoflurane and propofol anesthesia, and the recovery is slower. Particular attention should be paid to monitoring of neuromuscular block during sevoflurane anesthesia.