Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Dec 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialPostoperative analgesia with intramuscular morphine at fixed rate versus epidural morphine or sufentanil and bupivacaine in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.
We assessed the efficacy and side effects of postoperative analgesia with three different pain regimens in 90 patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. The patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: epidural morphine (EM) or sufentanil (ES), both combined with bupivacaine, or IM morphine (IM) at fixed intervals. Before incision, patients in the epidural groups received sufentanil or morphine in bupivacaine via a thoracic catheter, followed by a continuous infusion 1 h later. General anesthesia consisted of N2O/O2 and isoflurane for all groups. Patients in all groups received IV sufentanil as part of their anesthetic management. Patients in the IM group received IV sufentanil 1 microg/kg before incision, and patients in all groups received sufentanil 10 microg for inadequate analgesia. Postoperatively, the epidural or IM treatment was continued for > or =5 days. Postoperative analgesia at rest and during coughing and movement was significantly better in the epidural groups than in the IM group during the 5 consecutive days. There were no significant differences between the epidural groups. The incidence of most side effects was similar in all groups. We conclude that epidural analgesia provided better pain relief than IM analgesia, even if the latter was optimized by fixed-dose administration at fixed intervals and included adjustments on demand. Epidural sufentanil and morphine, both combined with bupivacaine, seemed to be equally effective with similar side effects. ⋯ Postoperative analgesia with epidural sufentanil or morphine and bupivacaine after major abdominal surgery seemed to be better than the conventional method of IM morphine treatment, despite optimal administration, i.e., fixed doses at fixed intervals with regular adjustments. Analgesic efficacy and side effects of epidural sufentanil and morphine were similar.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Dec 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialIntrathecal bupivacaine reduces pruritus and prolongs duration of fentanyl analgesia during labor: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.
Pruritus is a frequent complication (40%-100%) of intrathecal (IT) fentanyl 25 microg (F) for labor analgesia. The addition of IT bupivacaine 2.5 mg (B) to F has been reported in a nonrandomized series to have a 17.3% incidence of pruritus. This study prospectively evaluated the incidence and distribution of pruritus in laboring parturients receiving IT F + B. Sixty-five laboring parturients were randomly assigned to receive IT F, B, or F + B as part of a combined spinal-epidural technique. Visual analog scores, sensory level, motor strength, and pruritus were recorded before injection and at intervals thereafter. When present, the distribution of pruritus was evaluated. The duration of analgesia was determined as the time from IT drug administration until the patient requested supplemental analgesia. The median duration of analgesia in the F, B, and F + B groups was 62.5, 55.0, and 94.5 min, respectively. Compared with F alone, the combination of F + B led to a decreased frequency of pruritus (36.4% vs 95%). The incidence of facial pruritus (25%) was same in the F + B and F groups; however, the occurrence of pruritus distributed over the rest of the body was significantly more frequent in the F compared with the F + B group. The combination of F + B prolongs the duration of labor analgesia compared with IT F or B alone. F + B also leads to a decreased incidence of pruritus, except in the facial region. ⋯ When administered intrathecally with fentanyl 25 microg in laboring parturients, bupivacaine 2.5 mg attenuates the frequency of pruritus on all parts of the body except the face. This combination also results in a rapid onset and prolonged duration of labor analgesia compared with either drug alone.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Dec 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialProphylactic oral antiemetics for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting: granisetron versus domperidone.
In this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study, we evaluated the efficacy of the oral antiemetics, granisetron and domperidone, for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in 100 women undergoing major gynecologic surgery. Patients received either granisetron 2 mg or domperidone 20 mg (n = 50 in each group) orally 1 h before surgery. Standardized anesthetic techniques and postoperative analgesia regimens were used. Complete response (defined as no PONV and no administration of rescue antiemetic medication) for 0-3 h after anesthesia was 88% with granisetron and 52% with domperidone; the corresponding incidence for 3-24 h after anesthesia was 86% and 48% (P < 0.05). No clinically important adverse events due to the drugs were observed in any of the groups. In conclusion, the efficacy of preoperative oral granisetron is superior to that of domperidone for the prevention of PONV after major gynecologic surgery. ⋯ We compared the efficacy of granisetron and domperidone administered orally for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in women undergoing gynecologic surgery. Preoperative oral granisetron was more effective than domperidone.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Dec 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialPremedication with clonidine does not attenuate suppression of certain lymphocyte subsets after surgery.
Sixty-four patients undergoing elective major surgery were randomly assigned into a double-blinded, placebo-controlled, clinical trial to test the hypothesis that premedication with clonidine would attenuate postoperative reductions in circulating lymphocytes. The treatment group (n = 28) received a clonidine skin patch (0.3 mg/d) and a 0.6-mg oral loading dose 60-90 min before surgery. The control group (n = 36) received placebo patches and pills. Absolute blood levels of the following lymphocyte subsets were measured before induction of a standardized general anesthetic (baseline) and the morning after surgery: CD2, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, CD56, and the CD4:CD8 ratio. Significant decreases in lymphocyte subsets CD2, CD3, and CD4 were found in both groups; CD56 was significantly decreased only in the placebo group. However, the extent of lymphocyte depletion from baseline to Postoperative Day 1 between the clonidine and placebo groups was not different. Plasma concentrations of epinephrine, norepinephrine, and cortisol were measured from blood samples drawn at 8:00 AM on Postoperative Day 1. Plasma norepinephrine levels were significantly lower among patients who received clonidine. However, no significant differences were found in plasma epinephrine or cortisol levels between the clonidine and placebo groups. With a clinical dose, clonidine did not prevent postoperative lymphocyte depletion. alpha2-Agonists may not suppress adrenocortical stress responses sufficiently to prevent postoperative immune suppression. ⋯ Lymphocyte (white blood cell) counts often decrease after major surgery. We hypothesized that clonidine would reduce hormonal stress and blunt reductions in lymphocytes after major surgery. In a randomized trial, we found no differences from placebo in cortisol levels or lymphocyte changes. Lymphocyte levels did not predict infectious complications.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Dec 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA comparison of 0.5% bupivacaine, 0.5% ropivacaine, and 0.75% ropivacaine for interscalene brachial plexus block.
The onset time and duration of action of ropivacaine during an interscalene block are not known. The potentially improved safety profile of ropivacaine may allow the use of higher concentrations to try and speed onset time. We compared bupivacaine and ropivacaine to determine the optimal long-acting local anesthetic and concentration for interscalene brachial plexus block. Seventy-five adult patients scheduled for outpatient shoulder surgery under interscalene block were entered into this double-blind, randomized study. Patients were assigned (n = 25 per group) to receive an interscalene block using 30 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine, 0.5% ropivacaine, or 0.75% ropivacaine. All solutions contained fresh epinephrine in a 1:400,000 concentration. At 1-min intervals after local anesthetic injection, patients were assessed to determine loss of shoulder abduction and loss of pinprick in the C5-6 dermatomes. Before discharge, patients were asked to document the time of first oral narcotic use, when incisional discomfort began, and when full sensation returned to the shoulder. The mean onset time of both motor and sensory blockade was <6 min in all groups. Duration of sensory blockade was similar in all groups as defined by the three recovery measures. We conclude that there is no clinically important difference in times to onset and recovery of interscalene block for bupivacaine 0.5%, ropivacaine 0.5%, and ropivacaine 0.75% when injected in equal volumes. ⋯ In this study, we demonstrated a similar efficacy between equal concentrations of ropivacaine and bupivacaine. In addition, increasing the concentration of ropivacaine from 0.5% to 0.75% fails to improve the onset or duration of interscalene brachial plexus block.