Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialSmall-dose hyperbaric versus plain bupivacaine during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section.
In a double-blind, randomized trial, 98 parturients undergoing cesarean section received either hyperbaric or plain bupivacaine 6.6 mg combined with sufentanil 3.3 microg as part of a combined spinal-epidural procedure. To prevent hypotension, 1000 mL of lactated Ringer's solution, 500 mL of hydroxyethyl starch 6%, and ephedrine 5 mg were administered i.v. The height of the block was equal in both groups, but more patients in the plain group had blocks that were either too high or too low (P < 0.01). The number of patients requiring epidural supplementation was equal in both groups. Strict criteria were used to treat hypotension. The overall incidence of systolic blood pressure (<90 mm Hg) was 13%, whereas it was more pronounced in the plain group (21% vs 6% in the hyperbaric group, P < 0.05), which required more ephedrine (P < 0.05) and in which a greater incidence of nausea was noticed (P < 0.05). We conclude that the use of a small dose of intrathecal bupivacaine combined with sufentanil plus our described preloading regimen resulted in a lower incidence of hypotension. Further, we conclude that the use of hyperbaric bupivacaine in this manner provides a more reliable block and a lower incidence of hypotension than plain bupivacaine. ⋯ A small dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% combined with sufentanil used intrathecally during cesarean section offered a more reliable cephalad spread of the spinal block than the glucose-free combination, which was reflected in a lower incidence of hypotension and nausea.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialClearance of morphine in postoperative infants during intravenous infusion: the influence of age and surgery.
We analyzed morphine clearance values in infants receiving the drug by continuous i.v. infusion for analgesia after surgery, because we found lower steady-state morphine concentrations than we expected from our previous studies. Infants received morphine after a loading dose of 0.05 mg/kg and continuous infusion calculated to reach a steady-state concentration of 20 ng/mL. Blood was sampled twice on Postoperative Day 1 at times separated by at least 2 h, and morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide (M-6-G) concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Clearance of morphine was calculated as infusion rate divided by the steady-state morphine concentration. Morphine given to 26 infants by continuous i.v. infusion after major noncardiac surgery has rapidly increasing clearance values, from a median value of 9.2 mL x min(-1) x kg(-1) in infants 1-7 days old, 25.3 in infants 31-90 days old, and 31.0 in infants 91-180 days old to 48.9 in infants 180-380 days old. Adult clearance values are reached by 1 mo of age, more quickly than in infants of the same age previously studied who received morphine after cardiac surgeries. M-6-G was measured in all infants. The ratio of M-6-G to morphine concentrations was 1.9-2.1 in these infants, which is lower than ratios reported in older infants or adults by others, but higher than those reported in newborns. Infants with normal cardiovascular systems undergoing surgery clear morphine more efficiently than infants of the same age undergoing cardiac surgery. ⋯ Morphine removal from the body is slow in newborns but increases to reach adult values in the first months of life. Calculating the clearance of morphine from blood samples drawn during continuous i.v. infusions after surgery shows that this maturation occurs more quickly in infants undergoing noncardiac surgery (by 1-3 mo of age) than in those receiving morphine after cardiac surgery (by 6-12 mo of age).
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe optimal test dose of epinephrine for epidural injection with lidocaine solution in awake patients premedicated with oral clonidine.
We attempted to determine the optimal test dose of epinephrine for use with epidural anesthesia in awake patients premedicated with clonidine. Eighty-eight adult patients were randomized into two groups [oral premedication with clonidine 5 microg/kg (CLON) or no premedication (CONT)]. Before induction of general anesthesia, heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) were measured for 3 min after the i.v. injection of 3 mL of 1.5% lidocaine containing epinephrine (0, 1.25, 2.5, 5, 7.5, or 15 microg) in a randomized, double-blind manner. We calculated 95% confidence intervals for the peak HR and BP increases induced by each dose of epinephrine. At 7.5 microg, epinephrine induced a significantly greater increase in HR and BP in CLON than in CONT. The 95% confidence interval for the HR change induced by 7.5 microg of epinephrine in CLON was nearly the same as the accepted standard dose of epinephrine (15 microg) in CONT. We conclude that premedication with clonidine enhances HR and BP responses to the i.v. administration of epinephrine-containing epidural test solutions. Consequently, 7.5 microg of epinephrine may be sufficient to enable detection of accidental injection into a blood vessel in awake patients premedicated with clonidine 5 microg/kg. ⋯ Clonidine, a commonly used preanesthetic medication, alters patients' cardiovascular responses to drugs such as epinephrine. Our randomized, double-blind study suggests that, in awake patients receiving oral clonidine premedication, 7.5 microg of epinephrine (half the usual dose) is adequate as an indicator of accidental injection into the epidural vessels during epidural anesthesia.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe effect of varied doses of epinephrine on duration of lidocaine spinal anesthesia in the thoracic and lumbosacral dermatomes.
The efficacy of epinephrine in prolonging spinal analgesia has recently been confirmed in the lumbosacral but not in the thoracic, segments. Most previous studies used doses of epinephrine smaller than 0.3 mg. We studied the effects of 0.2, 0.4, or 0.6 mg of epinephrine added to hyperbaric lidocaine 60 mg in 7.5% dextrose solution for spinal anesthesia. Eighty patients were randomly divided into four groups: Group A received lidocaine without epinephrine, Group B received lidocaine plus 0.2 mL (0.2 mg) of epinephrine 1:1000 solution, Group C received lidocaine plus 0.4 mL (0.4 mg) of epinephrine, and Group D received lidocaine plus 0.6 mL (0.6 mg) of epinephrine. The maximal cephalad sensory level was between T2 and T3 for all groups. The median times for analgesia to regress two and four segments were significantly prolonged in Group D, but not in either Group B or C, compared with those in Group A. Times for regression to T12 and L3 were significantly prolonged in Groups B, C, and D compared with Group A. We conclude that the dose-dependent relationship of spinal analgesia can be applied to epinephrine, and that larger doses prolong lidocaine spinal anesthesia in the thoracic as well as the lumbosacral dermatomes. ⋯ Prolongation of lidocaine spinal analgesia by intrathecal epinephrine is established in the lumbosacral, but not in the thoracic, dermatomes. Three doses of epinephrine--0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 mg--were compared. A dose-dependent response and significant prolongation with the 0.6-mg dose in the thoracic dermatomes were confirmed.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialPremedication with fentanyl and midazolam decreases the reliability of intravenous lidocaine test dose.
This study was performed to determine whether premedication with midazolam and fentanyl prevents reliable detection of an i.v. lidocaine test dose. Thirty ASA physical status I or II patients received either 3 mL of saline or 1.5 mg of midazolam (1.5 mL) plus 75 microg of fentanyl (1.5 mL) i.v. in a randomized, double-blind fashion. Five minutes later, lidocaine 1 mg/kg was injected i.v. At 1.5 min before and every minute after lidocaine administration, each subject was questioned regarding the presence of four symptoms of systemic lidocaine toxicity. Any new tinnitus, perioral numbness, metallic taste, or light-headedness within 5 min after lidocaine administration was considered a positive response. All 15 patients in the saline group (100% sensitivity) had a positive response to i.v. lidocaine, but only 9 of 15 patients in the sedation group had a positive response (60% sensitivity; P = 0.017). We conclude that midazolam and fentanyl premedication decreases the reliability of subjective detection of i.v. lidocaine. ⋯ Anesthesiologists often rely on subjective symptoms to prevent local anesthetic toxicity while performing regional anesthesia. Sedatives are often administered during the administration of regional anesthesia. This study demonstrates that typical sedation decreases the reliability of detection of local anesthetic toxicity by subjective symptoms.