Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 1998
Esophageal stethoscope placement depth: its effect on heart and lung sound monitoring during general anesthesia.
Although the esophageal stethoscope has been used for many years, the effect of the depth of placement on the quality of the sounds obtained has never been investigated. The amplitude and frequency characteristics of the first and second heart sound and of inspiratory and expiratory breath sounds were determined at various stethoscope depths (from the distal tip) in 17 healthy anesthetized adults. The amplitude for each type of sound varied markedly with depth. Maximal amplitude for S1 was at 34 +/- 3 cm, for S2 at 27 +/- 2 cm, for inspiratory breath sound at 28 +/- 2 cm, and for expiratory breath sound at 26 +/- 2 cm. There was a positive linear correlation between the depth of maximal amplitude of these sounds and patient height. Peak frequency, in general, did not change with depth. We conclude that investigators should measure and document depth when performing studies involving the esophageal stethoscope. ⋯ Analysis of sound from the esophageal stethoscope at various depths reveals that placement depth greatly affects the sounds. A depth of 28-32 cm is recommended for clinical use; S1, S2, and inspiratory and expiratory sounds have a high amplitude in that range.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialAnalgesic and cognitive effects of intravenous ketamine-alfentanil combinations versus either drug alone after intradermal capsaicin in normal subjects.
Combinations of opioids and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists enhance acute antinociception and reduce opioid tolerance in some animal experiments but have received little rigorous study in humans. To quantitatively assess the nature of the interaction of these two classes of drugs in producing analgesia and cognitive impairment, we compared i.v. infusions of ketamine, alfentanil, and ketamine-alfentanil combinations in 12 normal volunteers after an intradermal injection of capsaicin. Drug doses for a 70-kg subject in this six-session, randomized, double-blind, cross-over study were: ketamine 20 mg, ketamine 5 mg, alfentanil 2 mg, alfentanil 0.5 mg, ketamine 10 mg + alfentanil 1 mg, and ketamine 2.5 mg + alfentanil 0.25 mg, given over 35 min. Outcome measures were background pain, area and magnitude of hyperalgesia to pinprick, and cognitive performance on the Digit Symbol Substitution Test and the Perception Speed Test. The results demonstrated simple additivity for the effects of ketamine and alfentanil on pain, pinprick hyperalgesia, and cognitive impairment. We conclude that, at least in this experimental pain model, there is no clear advantage or disadvantage of a ketamine-alfentanil combination over equianalgesic doses of either component. ⋯ In a double-blind, controlled trial, we administered doses of an opioid analgesic (alfentanil), an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist (ketamine), or their combination to normal volunteers and found no advantage of the combination over a larger dose of either drug alone in relieving pain caused by painful chemical stimulation.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialArterial oxygenation and shunt fraction during one-lung ventilation: a comparison of isoflurane and sevoflurane.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of isoflurane and sevoflurane on oxygenation and shunt fraction during one-lung ventilation (OLV). Twenty patients undergoing lobectomy for lung cancer and scheduled for long-term OLV were enrolled in this study. Patients were allocated to treatment with either isoflurane or sevoflurane. Arterial oxygenation, shunt fraction, and hemodynamics were evaluated at the end of two-lung ventilation; 20 min after the initiation of OLV; 20 min after the application of 4-cm positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to the dependent lung; 20 min after 8-cm PEEP; and 20 min after the conversion from OLV to two-lung ventilation. There was no significant difference between isoflurane and sevoflurane with regard to oxygenation, shunt fraction, or hemodynamics during OLV. PaO2 values after the application of 4-cm PEEP increased from 131.1 +/- 11.8 mm Hg to 190.6 +/- 22.9 mm Hg in the isoflurane group (P < 0.05) and from 127.2 +/- 14.3 mm Hg to 192.4 +/- 26.9 mm Hg in the sevoflurane group (P < 0.05). The selection of either isoflurane or sevoflurane for OLV was made without regard to arterial oxygenation and shunt fraction. PEEP application to the dependent lung is useful for improving oxygenation during OLV, but 8-cm PEEP had no added effect compared with 4-cm PEEP. ⋯ We compared the effects of isoflurane and sevoflurane on oxygenation, hemodynamics, and shunt fraction during one-lung ventilation in 20 patients undergoing scheduled lobectomy for lung cancer. There was no significant difference between isoflurane and sevoflurane with regard to oxygenation, shunt fraction, and hemodynamics during one-lung ventilation. The application of 4-cm positive end-expiratory pressure increased the partial pressure of arterial oxygen during one-lung ventilation.