Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Sep 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialEffective analgesia after bilateral tubal ligation.
Postpartum bilateral tubal ligation is a brief surgical procedure with minimal tissue injury, yet postoperative recovery times and analgesia requirements are often disproportionately large. To evaluate the analgesic efficacy of local anesthetic infiltration, 20 parturients scheduled for elective minilaparotomy and bilateral tubal ligation with either spinal or epidural anesthesia participated in this prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind trial. All patients received IV metoclopramide 10 mg and ketorolac 60 mg intraoperatively, as well as preincisional infiltration of the infraumbilical skin incision with 0.5% bupivacaine. Infiltration of bilateral uterine tubes and mesosalpinx was performed with either 0.5% bupivacaine (n = 10) or isotonic sodium chloride solution (saline) (n = 10). IV meperidine (25 mg every 3 min as needed) was given to treat pain in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). The total amount of meperidine administered in the PACU was significantly larger in the saline group than in the bupivacaine group. Pain scores at 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 min postoperatively and on the seventh postoperative day were significantly lower in the bupivacaine group than in the saline group. During tubal ligation, infiltration of uterine tubes and mesosalpinx with 0.5% bupivacaine significantly enhanced analgesia both in the immediate postoperative setting and on the seventh postoperative day compared with infiltration with sodium chloride. ⋯ During bilateral tubal ligation with either spinal or epidural anesthesia, preemptive analgesia using IV ketorolac, IV metoclopramide, and infiltration of the incised skin and uterine tubes with 0.5% bupivacaine allowed 9 of 10 patients to recover with no pain, nausea, vomiting, or cramping and to maintain good analgesia for 7 days postoperatively.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Sep 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialIntrathecal, but not intravenous, clonidine reduces experimental thermal or capsaicin-induced pain and hyperalgesia in normal volunteers.
Clonidine is approved for intraspinal administration in the treatment of neuropathic cancer pain. Some studies have suggested an analgesic effect after systemic clonidine administration. The purpose of this study was to compare the analgesic effects of intrathecal and IV clonidine with acute noxious stimulation and with hyperalgesia from intradermal capsaicin injection in volunteers. Sixteen healthy volunteers received intradermal injections of capsaicin (100 microg) before and after the IV or intrathecal injection of clonidine 50 or 150 microg in a randomized, double-blind manner. Pain and areas of mechanical hyperalgesia and allodynia were determined at specified intervals. In addition, pain to noxious heat stimulation was determined. The capsaicin injection produced pain, followed by hyperalgesia and allodynia. The intrathecal, but not IV, injection of 150 microg of clonidine reduced capsaicin-induced pain and area of hyperalgesia. Intrathecal clonidine (150 microg) reduced pain to heat stimulation, whereas IV clonidine did not. The groups did not differ in hemodynamic or sedative effects from clonidine. These data support the value of intraspinal administration of clonidine for the treatment of acute pain and of pain states associated with hyperalgesia. Similarly, they suggest that analgesia from the systemic administration of this alpha2-adrenergic agonist, if any, is weak in doses that produce sedation and reduce blood pressure. ⋯ To the extent that the experimental pain conditions used in this study reflect those in patients with acute and chronic pain, these data support the spinal rather than IV injection of clonidine for analgesia.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Sep 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe effect of fresh gas flow and anesthetic technique on the ability to control acute hemodynamic responses during surgery.
We evaluated the effect of the fresh gas flow (FGF) rate and the anesthetic technique on the ability to control the acute hyperdynamic response to a specific surgical stimulus during surgery in 90 consenting ASA physical status I-III patients undergoing lower abdominal procedures. After the administration of midazolam 2 mg IV, anesthesia was induced in all patients with propofol 1.5 mg/kg IV and fentanyl 1 microg/kg IV and was initially maintained with desflurane or isoflurane, 0.7 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration, at total FGF rates of either 1 or 3 L/min. In response to the surgical stimulation of skin incision and retropubic dissection, an increase in mean arterial pressure (MAP) >20% above the preincision baseline MAP value provoked a stepwise increase in the inspired concentration of the volatile anesthetic or the IV administration of a variable-rate infusion of esmolol. At both FGF rates, the acute hemodynamic response to surgical stimulation was more efficiently treated by increasing the inspired concentration of desflurane than isoflurane. At 1 L/min, the average time to control the increase in MAP was significantly shorter with desflurane (17+/-12 min) compared with isoflurane (29+/-16 min), with 60% of the patients in the isoflurane group requiring rescue therapy. When an esmolol infusion was used to control the increase in MAP, supplementation with fentanyl was required in 40% and 53% of patients anesthetized with desflurane and isoflurane, respectively. In conclusion, desflurane provided more rapid and reliable control of acute hemodynamic responses to surgical stimulation than isoflurane or esmolol when the volatile anesthetics were administered at low FGF rates. ⋯ At low fresh gas flow rates (1 L/min), desflurane more successfully and rapidly controlled the acute hemodynamic responses to painful surgical stimuli than isoflurane.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Sep 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialSimulation of an epidural test dose with intravenous isoproterenol in sevoflurane- and halothane-anesthetized children.
Isoproterenol has been suggested as an alternative marker for epidural test dosing in children receiving halothane anesthesia. The purpose of this prospective, randomized, double-blind study was to determine the chronotropic response to IV isoproterenol in sevoflurane-anesthetized children. Thirty-six ASA physical status I children (0.5-8 yr) were anesthetized with either halothane or sevoflurane at 1 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration adjusted for age in 70% nitrous oxide. Patients received incremental IV injections of isoproterenol until their heart rate increased > or = 20 bpm above baseline. The minimal effective dose of isoproterenol required to produce an increase of > or = 20 bpm was 55 ng/kg (42-72 ng/kg; 95% confidence interval) in sevoflurane-anesthetized children and 32 ng/kg (26-38 ng/kg; 95% confidence interval) in halothane-anesthetized children (P < 0.05). This dose-response study suggests that sevoflurane antagonizes beta-adrenergic-mediated chronotropic responses to isoproterenol more than halothane. These observations also suggest that larger doses of isoproterenol will be necessary for epidural test dosing in children receiving sevoflurane rather than halothane anesthesia. ⋯ Isoproterenol has been suggested as an alternative marker for epidural test dosing in children receiving halothane anesthesia. This isoproterenol dose-response study indicates that larger doses of isoproterenol will be necessary for epidural test dosing in children undergoing sevoflurane rather than halothane anesthesia.