Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Aug 2001
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialColloids versus crystalloids and tissue oxygen tension in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.
The effects of intravascular volume replacement regimens on tissue oxygen tension (ptiO(2)) are not definitely known. Forty-two consecutive patients scheduled for elective major abdominal surgery were prospectively randomized to receive either 6% hydroxyethyl starch (HES) (mean molecular weight 130 kd, degree of substitution 0.4, n = 21) or lactated Ringer's solution (RL, n = 21) for intravascular volume replacement. Fluids were administered perioperatively and continued for 24 h on the intensive care unit to keep central venous pressure between 8 and 12 mm Hg. The ptiO(2) was measured continuously in the left deltoid muscle by using microsensoric implantable partial pressure of oxygen catheters after the induction of anesthesia (baseline, T0), 60 min (T1) and 120 min thereafter (T2), at the end of surgery (T3), and on the morning of the first postoperative day on the intensive care unit (T4). HES 130/0.4 2920 +/- 360 mL and 11,740 +/- 2,630 mL of RL were given to the patients within the study period. Systemic hemodynamics and oxygenation (PaO(2), PaCO(2)) did not differ significantly between the two volume groups throughout the study. From similar baseline values, ptiO(2) increased significantly in the HES-treated patients (a maximum of 59% at T4), whereas it decreased in the RL group (a maximum of -23% at T4, P < 0.05). The largest differences of ptiO(2) were measured on the morning of the first postoperative day. We conclude that intravascular volume replacement with 6% HES 130/0.4 improved tissue oxygenation during and after major surgical procedures compared with a crystalloid-based volume replacement strategy. Improved microperfusion and less endothelial swelling may be responsible for the increase in ptiO(2) in the HES 130/0.4-treated patients. ⋯ In patients undergoing major abdominal surgery, a colloid-based (with hydroxyethyl starch [HES] 130/0.4) and a crystalloid-based (with lactated Ringer's solution [RL]) volume replacement regimen was compared regarding tissue oxygen tension (ptiO(2)) measured continuously by microsensoric implantable catheters. The ptiO(2) increased in the HES-treated (+59%) but decreased in the RL-treated (-23%) patients. Improved microcirculation may be the mechanism for the better ptiO(2) in the HES group.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Aug 2001
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialMore epidural than intravenous sufentanil is required to provide comparable postoperative pain relief.
The extent to which epidurally administered sufentanil acts directly on spinal opioid receptors remains controversial. We tested the hypothesis that small-dose boluses of sufentanil, given epidurally or IV, provide comparable analgesia at similar plasma sufentanil concentrations. The lipophilicity of sufentanil makes it likely to be absorbed into fat surrounding the epidural space. We therefore also tested the hypothesis that more epidural than IV sufentanil is required to produce comparable analgesia. Analgesia and plasma sufentanil concentrations were evaluated in 20 postoperative patients randomly assigned to patient-controlled epidural or IV sufentanil. Pain was evaluated with visual analog scales by blinded observers. Sufentanil doses and plasma concentrations were measured. Analgesia was similar with epidural and IV sufentanil administration. Plasma sufentanil concentrations were virtually identical in the two groups. However, significantly larger sufentanil doses were required with epidural administration: 238 +/- 50 microg vs 160 +/- 32 microg (P < 0.01). The primary mechanism by which small-dose boluses of epidurally-administered sufentanil produce analgesia seems to be systemic absorption of the drug with subsequent recirculation to the supraspinal opioid receptors. This study demonstrates that the cumulative dose of sufentanil, when administered as a small epidural bolus, is approximately 50% more than that administered IV to provide comparable analgesia. This indicates that the bioavailability of epidurally-administered sufentanil is reduced and suggests that a large proportion of the drug may be absorbed into the epidural fat. ⋯ More epidural than IV sufentanil was required to provide comparable postoperative pain relief and similar plasma sufentanil concentrations. These data suggest that when sufentanil is administered in small-dose boluses, much of the drug is absorbed into the epidural fat and that the primary mechanism by which epidurally administered sufentanil produces analgesia is via systemic absorption.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Aug 2001
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe use of remifentanil to facilitate the insertion of the laryngeal mask airway.
Propofol is often used as an IV induction drug for anesthesia and the insertion of a laryngeal mask airway (LMA). As a sole anesthetic, it may be associated with undesirable airway responses such as coughing and gagging. We conducted a randomized, double-blinded study to compare the conditions during insertion of the LMA in 120 patients who received normal saline (Group P), remifentanil 0.25 microg/kg (Group R1), or remifentanil 0.5 microg/kg (Group R2) before the induction of anesthesia with IV propofol. The addition of remifentanil significantly improved the conditions of insertion; in Group R1, 82.5% (33 of 40 patients), and in Group R2, 85.0% (34 of 40 patients) had excellent insertion conditions as compared with the Control group P, 32.5% (13 of 40 patients). Patients in Group P were apneic for a mean (SD) time of 85 (38) s, 186 (75) s in group R1, and 284 (130) s in group R2. There was a lesser decrease in mean arterial blood pressure in group R1. We conclude that remifentanil 0.25 microg/kg, when administered after IV propofol 2.5 mg/kg, provides excellent conditions for insertion of the LMA with minimal hemodynamic disturbances. ⋯ Small-dose remifentanil can provide excellent conditions for laryngeal mask airway insertion with minimal hemodynamic disturbances.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Aug 2001
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialIpsilateral shoulder pain after thoracotomy with epidural analgesia: the influence of phrenic nerve infiltration with lidocaine.
Patients receiving effective thoracic epidural analgesia for postthoracotomy pain may still complain of severe ipsilateral shoulder pain. The etiology of this pain is unclear. In this randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study, we investigated the effect of phrenic nerve infiltration with lidocaine or saline on postoperative shoulder pain in 48 patients. After completion of a lung resection, patients received either 10 mL of 1% lidocaine or 10 mL of 0.9% saline infiltrated into the periphrenic fat pad at the level of the diaphragm. Shoulder pain was experienced by 33% of patients receiving lidocaine, compared with 85% of patients receiving saline (P < 0.008). Overall pain scores were lower with lidocaine (P < 0.05). PaCO(2) values were not significantly higher with lidocaine in the first 2 h. We conclude that pain transmitted via the phrenic nerve and referred to the shoulder is the most likely explanation for the ipsilateral shoulder pain experienced by patients receiving epidural analgesia for postthoracotomy pain. ⋯ Ipsilateral shoulder pain after thoracotomy is common and may be severe, even in the presence of a functioning thoracic epidural. We have shown that infiltration of the phrenic nerve with local anesthetic significantly and safely reduces this shoulder pain, potentially allowing the ideal goal of a pain-free thoracotomy.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Aug 2001
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThoracic epidural bupivacaine attenuates supraventricular tachyarrhythmias after pulmonary resection.
Supraventricular tachyarrhythmias after pulmonary surgery are well described. Some investigators suggest that tachyarrhythmias after thoracic operations may result from the relative sympathotonic status produced by injury to the cardiac parasympathetic nerves. We examined whether postoperative thoracic sympathetic blockade by thoracic epidural bupivacaine might reduce the tachyarrhythmias after pulmonary resection. Fifty patients with lung cancer were randomized to receive epidural bupivacaine (Group B) or epidural morphine (Group M). Patients in Group B were given 6 to 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine epidurally, followed by epidural infusion at 3 to 5 mL/h for 3 days, and patients in Group M were given 2 to 3 mg morphine epidurally, followed by morphine infusion at a rate of 0.2 mg/h. Tachyarrhythmias were diagnosed by using the continuous heart rate trend and arrhythmia trend with a central monitoring system. Postoperative analgesia was not statistically different between groups. However, the incidence of postoperative tachyarrhythmias in Group B was significantly less than in Group M (1 of 23 vs 7 of 25, P = 0.0497, Fisher's exact test). The continuous infusion of thoracic epidural bupivacaine can reduce supraventricular tachyarrhythmias compared with epidural morphine infusion, presumably because of attenuation of the sympathotonic status after pulmonary resection. ⋯ We examined whether postoperative thoracic sympathetic blockade by thoracic epidural bupivacaine after pulmonary resection might reduce the tachyarrhythmias that may result from the relative sympathotonic status produced by injury to the cardiac parasympathetic nerves. The continuous infusion of thoracic epidural bupivacaine was shown to reduce supraventricular tachyarrhythmias.