Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Aug 2001
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThoracic epidural bupivacaine attenuates supraventricular tachyarrhythmias after pulmonary resection.
Supraventricular tachyarrhythmias after pulmonary surgery are well described. Some investigators suggest that tachyarrhythmias after thoracic operations may result from the relative sympathotonic status produced by injury to the cardiac parasympathetic nerves. We examined whether postoperative thoracic sympathetic blockade by thoracic epidural bupivacaine might reduce the tachyarrhythmias after pulmonary resection. Fifty patients with lung cancer were randomized to receive epidural bupivacaine (Group B) or epidural morphine (Group M). Patients in Group B were given 6 to 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine epidurally, followed by epidural infusion at 3 to 5 mL/h for 3 days, and patients in Group M were given 2 to 3 mg morphine epidurally, followed by morphine infusion at a rate of 0.2 mg/h. Tachyarrhythmias were diagnosed by using the continuous heart rate trend and arrhythmia trend with a central monitoring system. Postoperative analgesia was not statistically different between groups. However, the incidence of postoperative tachyarrhythmias in Group B was significantly less than in Group M (1 of 23 vs 7 of 25, P = 0.0497, Fisher's exact test). The continuous infusion of thoracic epidural bupivacaine can reduce supraventricular tachyarrhythmias compared with epidural morphine infusion, presumably because of attenuation of the sympathotonic status after pulmonary resection. ⋯ We examined whether postoperative thoracic sympathetic blockade by thoracic epidural bupivacaine after pulmonary resection might reduce the tachyarrhythmias that may result from the relative sympathotonic status produced by injury to the cardiac parasympathetic nerves. The continuous infusion of thoracic epidural bupivacaine was shown to reduce supraventricular tachyarrhythmias.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Aug 2001
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialPropofol in an emulsion of long- and medium-chain triglycerides: the effect on pain.
In a test of two formulations of propofol for induction, patients experienced less pain with the formulation in Intralipid (Propofol-Lipuro 1%) than with Diprivan 1%.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Aug 2001
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialIpsilateral shoulder pain after thoracotomy with epidural analgesia: the influence of phrenic nerve infiltration with lidocaine.
Patients receiving effective thoracic epidural analgesia for postthoracotomy pain may still complain of severe ipsilateral shoulder pain. The etiology of this pain is unclear. In this randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study, we investigated the effect of phrenic nerve infiltration with lidocaine or saline on postoperative shoulder pain in 48 patients. After completion of a lung resection, patients received either 10 mL of 1% lidocaine or 10 mL of 0.9% saline infiltrated into the periphrenic fat pad at the level of the diaphragm. Shoulder pain was experienced by 33% of patients receiving lidocaine, compared with 85% of patients receiving saline (P < 0.008). Overall pain scores were lower with lidocaine (P < 0.05). PaCO(2) values were not significantly higher with lidocaine in the first 2 h. We conclude that pain transmitted via the phrenic nerve and referred to the shoulder is the most likely explanation for the ipsilateral shoulder pain experienced by patients receiving epidural analgesia for postthoracotomy pain. ⋯ Ipsilateral shoulder pain after thoracotomy is common and may be severe, even in the presence of a functioning thoracic epidural. We have shown that infiltration of the phrenic nerve with local anesthetic significantly and safely reduces this shoulder pain, potentially allowing the ideal goal of a pain-free thoracotomy.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Aug 2001
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical TrialA multicenter evaluation of the time-course of action of two doses of rapacuronium after early and late reversal with neostigmine.
Early reversal of rapacuronium may accelerate return of neuromuscular function. This study was designed to compare early (2 min after rapacuronium) or late (at 25% recovery of the first twitch [T1] of train-of-four) reversal of rapacuronium with neostigmine. We studied 119 subjects between the ages of 18 and 75 yr. Anesthesia was induced with fentanyl and thiopental and maintained with nitrous oxide, propofol, and fentanyl. Mechanomyographic neuromuscular monitoring was performed by using train-of-four stimulation of the ulnar nerve. Two groups received 1.5 mg/kg rapacuronium followed by neostigmine (50 microg/kg) and glycopyrrolate (10 microg/kg) either at 2 min after rapacuronium bolus or at 25% T1 recovery. The other two groups received 2.0 mg/kg rapacuronium, after which neostigmine was similarly given. For each rapacuronium dose, the time from the administration of rapacuronium to the start of T1 recovery or 25% T1 recovery was significantly shorter in subjects who received the reversal 2 min after rapacuronium. However, late recovery, defined by times from administration of rapacuronium to 70%, or 80% T4/T1 recovery, was not influenced by early reversal administration. We conclude that initial recovery is accelerated by early administration of neostigmine. Time to full recovery after rapacuronium administration is, however, dose-dependent and not significantly altered by early administration of neostigmine. ⋯ "Rescue reversal," which includes the administration of neostigmine shortly after the administration of rapacuronium, may accelerate the return of spontaneous breathing (early recovery), but does not shorten the time to complete recovery of upper airway function.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Aug 2001
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialMore epidural than intravenous sufentanil is required to provide comparable postoperative pain relief.
The extent to which epidurally administered sufentanil acts directly on spinal opioid receptors remains controversial. We tested the hypothesis that small-dose boluses of sufentanil, given epidurally or IV, provide comparable analgesia at similar plasma sufentanil concentrations. The lipophilicity of sufentanil makes it likely to be absorbed into fat surrounding the epidural space. We therefore also tested the hypothesis that more epidural than IV sufentanil is required to produce comparable analgesia. Analgesia and plasma sufentanil concentrations were evaluated in 20 postoperative patients randomly assigned to patient-controlled epidural or IV sufentanil. Pain was evaluated with visual analog scales by blinded observers. Sufentanil doses and plasma concentrations were measured. Analgesia was similar with epidural and IV sufentanil administration. Plasma sufentanil concentrations were virtually identical in the two groups. However, significantly larger sufentanil doses were required with epidural administration: 238 +/- 50 microg vs 160 +/- 32 microg (P < 0.01). The primary mechanism by which small-dose boluses of epidurally-administered sufentanil produce analgesia seems to be systemic absorption of the drug with subsequent recirculation to the supraspinal opioid receptors. This study demonstrates that the cumulative dose of sufentanil, when administered as a small epidural bolus, is approximately 50% more than that administered IV to provide comparable analgesia. This indicates that the bioavailability of epidurally-administered sufentanil is reduced and suggests that a large proportion of the drug may be absorbed into the epidural fat. ⋯ More epidural than IV sufentanil was required to provide comparable postoperative pain relief and similar plasma sufentanil concentrations. These data suggest that when sufentanil is administered in small-dose boluses, much of the drug is absorbed into the epidural fat and that the primary mechanism by which epidurally administered sufentanil produces analgesia is via systemic absorption.