Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 2002
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe timing of intravenous crystalloid administration and incidence of cardiovascular side effects during spinal anesthesia: the results from a randomized controlled trial.
We conducted a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of crystalloids in preventing spinal-induced hypotension (SIH) and cardiovascular side effects (CVSE) in a group of surgical patients. Participants were assigned to receive lactated Ringer's solution at 1-2 mL/min (Placebo group, n = 142); lactated Ringer's at 20 mL/kg starting 20 min before spinal block (n = 130); or lactated Ringer's at 20 mL/kg starting at the time of spinal block (n = 132). SIH was defined as a decrease of > or = 30% in baseline systolic blood pressure, and CVSE as SIH plus nausea, vomiting, or faintness requiring treatment. The incidence of SIH was similar in all treatment groups. Compared to placebo, crystalloid administration at the time of spinal block resulted in a significant reduction in the proportion of patients developing CVSE from 9.9% to 2.3%. The corresponding relative proportion was 0.23 (95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.78; P = 0.019), and one additional case of CVSE was avoided for each 13 patients receiving crystalloids at the time of spinal block instead of placebo. Administration of crystalloids at the time of spinal block seems to be effective because it provides additional intravascular fluids during the period of highest risk of CVSE after spinal anesthesia. ⋯ Crystalloids are frequently administered to nonobstetric patients minutes before spinal anesthesia to prevent cardiovascular side effects (CVSE). This randomized controlled trial shows that although crystalloids administered before spinal block result in no clinical benefit, they significantly reduce the risk of CVSE when administered at the time of spinal block.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 2002
Comparative StudyElectrocardiographic electrodes provide the same results as expensive special sensors in the routine monitoring of anesthetic depth.
The Bispectral Index (BIS) is a mathematically derived electroencephalographic (EEG) derivative that has been introduced to monitor depth of anesthesia (1,2). The A-2000 BIS monitoring system (Aspect Medical Systems, Inc., Newton, MA) is currently the only commercially available system to monitor depth of anesthesia. In several studies, its propensity to optimize the use of hypnotics to maintain and achieve a certain depth of anesthesia has been described (3,4). Some studies have even proposed that the routine use of the monitoring system can decrease awareness (1,5), an increasing factor in malpractice claims. The cost-benefit calculations for BIS monitoring suffer from the fact that like its predecessor, the 1000-A BIS monitor, the A-2000 BIS monitoring system demands the use of expensive, special electrodes (6). Although the application of the single-use BIS sensor is very comfortable and easy to use, its high price of approximately $10-20 US prevents many anesthesiologists from using it. Furthermore, whereas the former model of the monitor (1000-A BIS monitor; Aspect Medical Systems, Inc.) used standardized connectors, which allowed the use of other electrodes such as electrocardiogram (ECG), the new monitoring system makes this very difficult because of special connectors that match the equivalent connector at the proximal BIS sensor site. The purpose of this prospective study was to compare BIS values derived from the original BIS sensor with BIS values derived from commercially available ECG electrodes. This comparison was made possible by designing and manufacturing a connector allowing the use of ECG electrodes. ⋯ The Bispectral Index (BIS) monitor adequately monitors depth of anesthesia. The routine use of this monitor has been hampered by the benefit-cost equation because only special expensive electrodes can be used. We examined the agreement of BIS values obtained by original sensor electrodes and commercial electrocardiogram (ECG) electrodes. These ECG electrodes can replace more expensive BIS sensors.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 2002
Comparative StudyTransesophageal echocardiography interpretation: a comparative analysis between cardiac anesthesiologists and primary echocardiographers.
Diagnostic interpretation of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) examinations may vary, particularly when the echocardiographer is also the anesthesiologist. We therefore evaluated the concordance of TEE interpretation as part of a process of continuous quality improvement (CQI). Ten cardiac anesthesiologists participating in a CQI program conducted 154 comprehensive TEE examinations, each consisting of 16 major fields describing cardiac anatomy and function. These examinations were subsequently interpreted off-line by two primary echocardiographers (a radiologist and a cardiologist). Agreement was assessed using the kappa coefficient and percent agreement. Overall kappa and percent agreement were 0.58 and 83% for anesthesiologists versus radiologist, 0.57 and 80% for anesthesiologists versus cardiologist, and 0.60 and 82% for radiologist versus cardiologist. Anesthesiologists with longer than 5 yr of TEE experience had higher levels of agreement with the radiologist when assessing the aorta, right atrium, pulmonary vein flow, transmitral flow, and fractional area change. Cardiac anesthesiologists supported by a CQI program interpret TEE examinations at a level comparable with physicians whose primary practice is echocardiography. Thus, the anesthesiologist and the intraoperative echocardiographer need not be mutually exclusive. ⋯ Interpretation of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiograms can be reliably performed by cardiac anesthesiologists.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 2002
Comparative StudyThe neurotoxicity of local anesthetics on growing neurons: a comparative study of lidocaine, bupivacaine, mepivacaine, and ropivacaine.
Local anesthetics can be neurotoxic. To test the hypothesis that exposure to local anesthetics produces morphological changes in growing neurons and to compare this neurotoxic potential between different local anesthetics, we performed in vitro cell biological experiments with isolated dorsal root ganglion neurons from chick embryos. The effects of lidocaine, bupivacaine, mepivacaine, and ropivacaine were examined microscopically and quantitatively assessed using the growth cone collapse assay. We observed that all local anesthetics produced growth cone collapse and neurite degeneration. However, they showed significant differences in the dose response. The IC(50) values were approximately, 10(-2.8) M for lidocaine, 10(-2.6) M for bupivacaine, 10(-1.6) M for mepivacaine, and 10(-2.5) M for ropivacaine at 15 min exposure. Some reversibility was observed after replacement of the media. At 20 h after washout, bupivacaine and ropivacaine showed insignificant percentage growth cone collapse in comparison to their control values whereas those for lidocaine and mepivacaine were significantly higher than the control values. Larger concentrations of the nerve growth factor (NGF) did not improve this reversibility. In conclusion, local anesthetics produced morphological changes in growing neurons with significantly different IC(50). The reversibility of these changes differed among the four drugs and was not influenced by the NGF concentration. ⋯ Local anesthetics induce growth cone collapse and neurite degeneration in the growing neurons. Mepivacaine was safer than lidocaine, bupivacaine, and ropivacaine for the primary cultured chick neurons.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 2002
Case ReportsInterscalene and infraclavicular block for bilateral distal radius fracture.
Brachial plexus blockade is a suitable technique for surgery of the forearm, because it provides good intraoperative anesthesia as well as prolonged postoperative analgesia when long-acting local anesthetics are used. However, simultaneous blockade of both upper extremities has rarely been performed (1), because local anesthetic toxicity caused by the amount of drug needed to achieve an efficient block on both sides may be a problem. We report a case of successful bilateral brachial plexus block with ropivacaine in a patient with bilateral distal radius fracture, with each fracture requiring an open osteosynthesis. ⋯ This case report presents the performance of a simultaneous blockade of both upper extremities in a patient who sustained a bilateral distal radius fracture. The patient was known to be difficult to intubate and to have a severe hypersensitivity to opioids.