Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 2002
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialTramadol infusion for postthoracotomy pain relief: a placebo-controlled comparison with epidural morphine.
We compared continuous IV tramadol as an alternative to neuraxial or systemic opioids for the management of postthoracotomy pain in a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled study. General anesthesia was supplemented by thoracic epidural analgesia with 0.25% bupivacaine. At rib approximation, patients received one of the following: IV tramadol (150-mg bolus followed by infusion, total 450 mg/24 h, n = 29), epidural morphine (2 mg, then 0.2 mg/h, n = 30), or patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine only (n = 30). All patients received PCA morphine and rescue morphine as necessary postoperatively. For the first 24 h, pain and sedation scores and respiratory, cardiovascular, and side effect measures were monitored. There was no significant difference in pain scores and PCA morphine use between tramadol and epidural morphine. Pain scores at rest and on coughing were lower in the Tramadol and Epidural Morphine groups than in the PCA Morphine group at various time points over the first 12 h. The Tramadol and Epidural Morphine groups used significantly less hourly PCA morphine than the PCA Morphine group at specific time points in the first 10 h. Vital capacities in the Tramadol group were significantly closer to baseline values at the 20-h point than in the PCA Morphine group. We conclude that an intraoperative bolus of tramadol followed by an infusion was as effective as epidural morphine and avoided the necessity of placing a thoracic epidural catheter. ⋯ A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study of postthoracotomy pain relief showed that IV tramadol in the form of a bolus followed by continuous infusion was as effective as epidural morphine. The use of tramadol avoids the necessity of placing a thoracic epidural catheter.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 2002
The effect of chin lift, jaw thrust, and continuous positive airway pressure on the size of the glottic opening and on stridor score in anesthetized, spontaneously breathing children.
Chin lift and jaw thrust are two common maneuvers used to improve the patency of the upper airway during general anesthesia. We investigated the effect of these maneuvers combined with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on the size of glottic opening and on stridor score. Forty children, aged 2--9 yr, premedicated with midazolam and spontaneously breathing end-tidal 1% halothane and equal parts of nitrous oxide and oxygen, were studied. A flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope was placed via mask and one nostril to the level of the junction of the soft palate and oropharynx. Video recordings and simultaneous stridor scores were obtained during six conditions: 1) chin unsupported, 2) manual chin lift, 3) chin lift and CPAP 10 cm H(2)O, 4) repeat chin unsupported, 5) manual jaw thrust, and 6) jaw thrust and CPAP 10 cm H(2)O. Videos were analyzed to determine the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score. POGO score increased (P < 0.05) in Conditions 2, 3, 5, and 6. With increasing POGO score there was a decrease in stridor score (P < 0.05). ⋯ Chin lift and jaw thrust maneuvers combined with continuous positive airway pressure improve the view of the glottic opening as viewed by flexible nasal laryngoscopy and decrease stridor in anesthetized, spontaneously breathing children.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 2002
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialPhysostigmine does not antagonize sevoflurane anesthesia assessed by bispectral index or enhances recovery.
In this double-blinded study, we investigated the effect of physostigmine on sevoflurane anesthesia and recovery. Forty female patients scheduled for breast biopsy were randomly assigned to receive either physostigmine 2 mg IV or an equal volume of normal saline after skin closure. Anesthesia was induced and maintained with sevoflurane in oxygen. After skin closure, a steady state of 0.6% inspired and end-tidal sevoflurane concentration was obtained, heart rate, blood pressure, and Bispectral index (BIS) baseline values were recorded, and physostigmine or normal saline was administered. Hemodynamics and BIS values were also recorded 5, 8, and 10 min after treatments. Anesthesia was discontinued, and orientation, sedation, sitting ability, and "picking up matches" scores were recorded immediately after extubation and 15 and 30 min later. No differences were found between the two groups in BIS (69, 70, 70, and 71 in the Physostigmine group versus 70, 74, 75, and 76 in the Control group) or blood pressure. Only heart rate was increased 8 min after physostigmine (P < 0.05 versus the control). Scores assessing early recovery were similar in the two groups at all time points. We conclude that physostigmine does not change BIS or enhance recovery after sevoflurane anesthesia. ⋯ This double-blinded, randomized study investigated the impact of physostigmine of BIS values during 0.6% sevoflurane anesthesia as well as in the postoperative recovery, when sevoflurane is administered as a sole anesthetic. Physostigmine has no effect on BIS values or on the tests assessing recovery.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 2002
Comparative StudyThe neuromuscular transmission module versus the relaxometer mechanomyograph for neuromuscular block monitoring.
The neuromuscular transmission module (M-NMT) is an integrated piezoelectric motion sensor module incorporated in the AS/3(TM) anesthesia monitor. We compared the neuromuscular block of 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium (twice the 95% effective dose) monitored by the M-NMT with that monitored by the Relaxometer mechanomyograph (MMG). The two monitors were alternately allocated to the left or right hands of 20 patients. T(1)%, the first twitch of the train-of-four (TOF), and the TOF ratio (T(4)/T(1)) were used for evaluating the neuromuscular block. There was no significant difference in the mean (min) plus minus SD onset time or time to 0.8 TOF ratio recovery measured by the M-NMT (1.5 plus/minus 0.3, 49.4 plus/minus 8.1) compared with MMG (1.8 plus/minus 0.6, 50.9 plus/minus 9.9), respectively. However, the time (min) to 25% T(1) recovery was significantly longer when monitored by the M-NMT (25.6 plus/minus 8) than by the MMG (20.2 plus/minus 6.3). During recovery from neuromuscular block, the difference between the TOF ratios measured by the two monitors showed a bias of -0.031, and the limits of agreement (bias plus/minus 1.96 SD) were -0.281 and +0.22. The M-NMT monitor could determine the time to tracheal intubation as well as full recovery from neuromuscular block, but it lagged behind the MMG in determining the time to rocuronium repeat dose administration. ⋯ Compared with the Relaxometer mechanomyograph, the neuromuscular transmission module could equally indicate time to tracheal intubation and full recovery from 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium neuromuscular block. Its small quick-fit sensor has the advantage, in an often crowded and busy operating room, of being incorporated in the AS/3(TM) anesthesia workstation.
-
The tracheas of obese patients may be more difficult to intubate than those of normal-weight patients. We studied 100 morbidly obese patients (body mass index >40 kg/m(2)) to identify which factors complicate direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Preoperative measurements (height, weight, neck circumference, width of mouth opening, sternomental distance, and thyromental distance) and Mallampati score were recorded. The view during direct laryngoscopy was graded, and the number of attempts at tracheal intubation was recorded. Neither absolute obesity nor body mass index was associated with intubation difficulties. Large neck circumference and high Mallampati score were the only predictors of potential intubation problems. Because in all but one patient the trachea was intubated successfully by direct laryngoscopy, the neck circumference that requires an intervention such as fiberoptic bronchoscopy to establish an airway remains unknown. We conclude that obesity alone is not predictive of tracheal intubation difficulties. ⋯ In 100 morbidly obese patients, neither obesity nor body mass index predicted problems with tracheal intubation. However, a high Mallampati score (greater-than-or-equal to 3) and large neck circumference may increase the potential for difficult laryngoscopy and intubation.