Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 2002
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialLidocaine iontophoresis versus eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA) for IV placement in children.
Pain during venipuncture is a major source of concern to children and their caretakers. Iontophoresis is a novel technique that uses an electrical current to facilitate movement of solute ions (lidocaine) across the stratum corneum barrier to provide dermal analgesia. In this study, we compared dermal analgesia provided by lidocaine iontophoresis and eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA). After informed consent, 26 children, aged 7-16 yr, who required venous cannulation on multiple occasions, were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, crossover study to receive EMLA and iontophoresis on separate occasions. During a third session, each subject received his or her preferred treatment. Pain during venipuncture was assessed by the subject, parent, observer, and technician performing the procedure, by use of a 100-mm visual analog scale. The observer also used the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale to rate the subject's pain. Ratings of subject satisfaction were also assessed. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the subject-rated visual analog scale or the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale scores. Eleven (50%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 31%-69%) of the 22 subjects who completed both sessions preferred iontophoresis. Five subjects (23%; 95% CI, 10%-44%), including two who did not tolerate treatment with iontophoresis, preferred EMLA, and six (27%; 95% CI, 13%-48%) had no preference for the intervention to provide dermal analgesia. We conclude that lidocaine iontophoresis provides similar pain relief for insertion of IV catheters as EMLA and is a useful noninvasive alternative to establish dermal analgesia for venous cannulation. ⋯ Iontophoresis is a technique that uses an electrical current to facilitate movement of solute ions (lidocaine) across the stratum corneum barrier to provide dermal analgesia. Lidocaine iontophoresis provides similar pain relief for insertion of IV catheters as eutectic mixture of local anesthetics and is a useful noninvasive alternative to establish dermal analgesia for venous cannulation.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 2002
Ventilation with negative airway pressure induces a cytokine response in isolated mouse lung.
We tested the hypothesis that, under relatively low tidal volume (VT) mechanical ventilation, continuing lung decruitment induced by negative end-expiratory pressure (NEEP) would increase the lung cytokine response, potentially contributing to lung injury. Mouse lungs were excised and randomly assigned to one of 3 different ventilatory strategies: 1) the zero end-expiratory pressure group served as a control, 2) the NEEP7 group received a NEEP of -7.5 cm H(2)O, and 3) the NEEP15 group received a NEEP of -15 cm H(2)O. In all 3 groups, a VT of 7 mL/kg was used. After 2 h of ventilation, lung lavage fluid was collected for measurements of tumor necrosis factor-alpha, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, and lactate dehydrogenase. Increases in plateau pressure before and after mechanical ventilation were significantly greater in the NEEP15 group compared with the zero end-expiratory pressure group or NEEP7 group. Lung compliance was decreased in the NEEP15 compared with the other two groups. Concentrations of tumor necrosis factor-alpha, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, and lactate dehydrogenase in lung lavage were larger in the NEEP15 group than in the other groups. Atelectatic lung during repeated collapse and reopening of lung units accentuates the lung cytokine response that may contribute to lung injury even during relatively low VT mechanical ventilation. ⋯ Repeated closing and reopening of lung units induced by negative end-expiratory pressure resulted in lung inflammation and cell injury even under mechanical ventilation using a normal tidal volume. This finding may have clinical relevance in certain patients who are prone to atelectasis during mechanical ventilation.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 2002
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialEpinephrine markedly improves thoracic epidural analgesia produced by a small-dose infusion of ropivacaine, fentanyl, and epinephrine after major thoracic or abdominal surgery: a randomized, double-blinded crossover study with and without epinephrine.
We have shown that epinephrine markedly improves the analgesic effect of a thoracic epidural infusion of bupivacaine and fentanyl. Ropivacaine has an intrinsic vasoconstrictive effect, and epinephrine may therefore not have the same pharmacokinetic interaction in a ropivacaine-fentanyl infusion; but a possible spinal cord alpha(2)-agonist effect of epinephrine would give the same positive pharmacodynamic interaction with ropivacaine and fentanyl during epidural analgesia. In a prospective, randomized, crossover study, a thoracic epidural infusion of ropivacaine 1 mg/mL and fentanyl 2 microg/mL with or without epinephrine 2 microg/mL was given to 12 patients in a double-blinded manner after major thoracic or upper abdominal surgery. Main outcome measures were pain intensity at rest and when coughing, evaluated on a visual analog scale. Extent of sensory blockade was evaluated by determining dermatomal hypoesthesia to cold. Pain increased (P < 0.001) and hypoesthetic dermatomal segments decreased (P < 0.001) when epinephrine was omitted from the triple epidural infusion. After 3 h without epinephrine, pain intensity when coughing was unacceptable despite rescue analgesia. After restarting the triple epidural mixture with epinephrine, pain was again reduced to mild pain when coughing, and the sensory blockade was restored. The mixture with epinephrine caused less nausea and facilitated mobilization. We conclude that epinephrine improves the pain relief and reduces the side effects of a thoracic epidural infusion of ropivacaine and fentanyl after major thoracic or upper abdominal surgery. ⋯ Epidural epinephrine markedly improves the pain relief and sensory blockade of a small-dose thoracic epidural infusion of ropivacaine and fentanyl. Nausea was reduced, and mobilization of the patients was facilitated.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 2002
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe hypnotic and analgesic effects of oral clonidine during sevoflurane anesthesia in children: a dose-response study.
Although clonidine has both hypnotic and analgesic actions, the dose relationship for each actions is still unknown in a clinical setting when clonidine is used as a premedication in children. We studied 80 ASA physical status I children (age range, 3-8 yr). Subjects were randomly divided into two groups (minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration [MAC]-Awake group, n = 40; MAC-Tetanus group, n = 40). Each patient received one dose of clonidine from 1 to 5 microg/kg orally, 100 min before arrival at the operating room. Anesthesia was induced and maintained with sevoflurane in oxygen and air. Before tracheal intubation, end-tidal sevoflurane was decreased stepwise by 0.2% at the start of 1.2%, a verbal command was given to the patients, and MAC-awake was determined in each patient. We also investigated MAC-tetanus, determined with transcutaneous electric tetanic stimulations, after tracheal intubation in each patient by observing the motor response to a transcutaneous electric tetanic stimulus to the ulnar nerve at a sevoflurane concentration decreased stepwise by 0.25% at the start of 2.75%. The initial reduction in MAC-tetanus was not as steep as that in MAC-awake. Clonidine reduced MAC-tetanus by 40% at the maximal dose of 5 microg/kg, whereas MAC-awake was already reduced by 50% at 2 microg/kg. We conclude that separate dose-response relationships for oral clonidine are present regarding the hypnotic and analgesic effects in children undergoing sevoflurane anesthesia. ⋯ Separate dose-response relationships for oral clonidine were found regarding the hypnotic and analgesic effects in children undergoing sevoflurane anesthesia.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 2002
Pressure support compared with controlled mechanical ventilation in experimental lung injury.
It has been suggested that, in acute lung injury (ALI), spontaneous breathing activity may increase oxygenation because of an improvement of ventilation-perfusion distribution. Pressure support ventilation (PSV) is one of the assisted spontaneous breathing modes often used in critical care medicine. We sought to determine the prolonged effects of PSV on gas exchange in experimental ALI. We hypothesized that PSV may increase oxygenation because of an improvement in ventilation-perfusion distribution. Thus, ALI was induced in 20 pigs by using repetitive lung lavage. Thereafter, the animals were randomized to receive either PSV with a pressure level set to achieve a tidal volume >4 mL/kg and a respiratory rate <40 min(-1) (n = 10) or controlled mechanical ventilation (CMV) with a tidal volume of 10 mL/kg and a respiratory rate of 20 min(-1) (n = 10). Positive end-expiratory pressure was set at 10 cm H(2)O in both groups. Blood gas analyses and determination of ventilation-perfusion (.V(A)/.Q) distribution were performed at the onset of ALI and after 2, 4, 8, and 12 h. The main result was an improvement of oxygenation because of a decrease of pulmonary shunt and an increase of areas with normal .V(A)/.Q ratios during PSV (P < 0.005). However, during CMV, a more pronounced reduction of shunt was observed compared with PSV (P < 0.005). We conclude that, in this model of ALI, PSV improves gas exchange because of a reduction of .V(A)/.Q inequality. However, improvements in .V(A)/.Q distribution may be more effective with CMV than with PSV. ⋯ Assisted spontaneous breathing may have beneficial effects on gas exchange in acute lung injury. We tested this hypothesis for pressure support ventilation in an animal model of acute lung injury. Our results demonstrate that pressure support does not necessarily provide better gas exchange than controlled mechanical ventilation.