Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 2003
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialNalbuphine versus ondansetron for prevention of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus after cesarean delivery.
In this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study, we compared the prophylactic efficacy of nalbuphine and ondansetron for the prevention of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus after cesarean delivery. Two-hundred-forty parturients were randomly allocated into four groups. The N-4 group, O-4 group, O-8 group, and placebo group received IV 4 mg of nalbuphine, 4 mg of ondansetron, 8 mg of ondansetron, and 4 mL of normal saline, respectively, immediately after the baby was delivered. In the postanesthesia care unit, we found that the severity of pruritus score in the four groups was significantly different (P < 0.001). The prophylactic success rate for pruritus of the N-4, O-4, O-8, and placebo groups was 20%, 13%, 12%, and 6%, respectively (P < 0.001). The pruritus score between N-4 and placebo and O-4 and placebo was significantly different (P < 0.001 and P = 0.006, respectively). Treatment for pruritus was requested by patients in 25%, 47%, 51%, and 72% of patients in the N-4, O-4, O-8, and placebo groups, respectively (P < 0.001). There were no differences among groups in nausea/vomiting score, pain score, sedation score, or shivering score at 4, 8, and 24 h after surgery. Nalbuphine and ondansetron are more effective than placebo for the prevention of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus after cesarean delivery. ⋯ Nalbuphine and ondansetron are more effective than placebo for the prevention of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus after cesarean delivery.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 2003
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe effect of dexamethasone on side effects after coronary revascularization procedures.
Corticosteroids decrease side effects after noncardiac elective surgery. We designed this randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study to test the hypothesis that standard doses of dexamethasone (4 mg x2) would reduce postoperative nausea, vomiting, and pain, decrease the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF), and improve appetite after cardiac surgery, thereby facilitating the recovery process. A total of 300 patients undergoing coronary revascularization surgery were enrolled in this clinical study. The anesthetic management was standardized in all patients. Dexamethasone (4 mg/mL) or saline (1 mL) was administered after the induction of anesthesia and a second dose of the same study drug was given on the morning after surgery. The incidence of AF was determined by analyzing the first 72 h of continuously recorded electrocardiogram records after cardiac surgery. The patients were assessed at 24- and 48-h intervals after surgery, as well as at the time of hospital discharge, to determine the incidence and severity of postoperative side effects (e.g., nausea, vomiting, pain) and patient satisfaction scores. Dexamethasone significantly reduced the need for antiemetic rescue medication on the first postoperative day (30% versus 42%), and the incidences of nausea (15% versus 26%) and vomiting (5% versus 16%) on the second postoperative day (P < 0.05). In addition, dexamethasone significantly reduced the percentage of patients with a depressed appetite on the second postoperative day. However, the corticosteroid failed to decrease the incidence of AF (27% versus 32%) or the total dosage of opioid analgesic medication administered in the postoperative period. We conclude that dexamethasone (8 mg in divided doses) was beneficial in reducing emetic symptoms and improving appetite after cardiac surgery. However, this dose of the corticosteroid does not seem to have antiarrhythmic or analgesic-sparing properties. ⋯ Dexamethasone (8 mg IV) was beneficial in reducing emetic symptoms and increasing appetite after cardiac surgery. However, this dose of the corticosteroid failed to decrease postoperative pain or the incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 2003
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialPostoperative analgesia in children undergoing myringotomy and placement equalization tubes in ambulatory surgery.
We enrolled 120 children undergoing bilateral myringotomy and tube placement in this prospective, randomized, observer-blinded study. Patients were randomized into one of four groups: Group 1 (control) was plain acetaminophen 10 mg/kg orally, Group 2 was acetaminophen 10 mg/kg with 1 mg/kg of codeine orally, Group 3 was transnasal butorphanol 25 micro g/kg given immediately after the induction of anesthesia, and Group 4 was ketorolac 1 mg/kg given IM immediately after the induction of anesthesia. All children received oral midazolam (0.6 mg/kg) before surgery. A nurse blinded to the analgesic technique used assessed the child's behavior at the induction of anesthesia and in the postanesthesia care unit using a 4-point scale. Analgesic effectiveness was determined by assessing the child's pain at 5-min intervals using a modified 10-point objective pain scale. In the postanesthesia care unit, rescue pain medication was administered for an objective pain scale >or=4 or a behavior score >or=3. Our data suggest that IM ketorolac is a promising analgesic to be used in this surgical population. Time to first rescue analgesic was longest in the ketorolac group, and there was no associated postoperative vomiting or nausea. IM ketorolac given during surgery was the best analgesic regimen for these procedures. ⋯ We compared four different analgesics in the management of pain after placement of pressure equalization tubes during myringotomy in children and demonstrated that ketorolac or butorphanol provided superior analgesia when compared with acetaminophen with codeine or plain acetaminophen. Children who received ketorolac versus butorphanol had less vomiting in the 24 h after surgery.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 2003
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialSympathetic and vascular consequences from remifentanil in humans.
We explored the possible mechanisms of hypotension during the administration of sedation-analgesia doses of remifentanil in young (ASA physical status I) volunteers (n = 24). Cardiorespiratory and sympathetic variables were collected at baseline and at plasma concentrations of remifentanil (2 and 4 ng/mL). Monitoring included electrocardiogram, heart rate (HR), direct blood pressure, muscle sympathetic nerve activity, and forearm blood flow (FBF). A cold pressor test (1-min hand immersion in ice water) quantified analgesia effectiveness (visual analog scale, 0-100). Visual analog scale to the cold pressor test (62 at baseline) decreased to 27 and 18 during remifentanil infusions. Respiratory rate decreased and end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO(2)) increased with increasing doses of remifentanil; HR, direct blood pressure, muscle sympathetic nerve activity, SpO(2) remained unchanged, but FBF increased compared with placebo. In a second study (n = 7), timed respiration was used to maintain ETCO(2) during remifentanil, but FBF still increased. In a third study (n = 11), direct effects of remifentanil on vascular tone were determined with progressive infusions from 1 to 100 micro g/h into the brachial artery; FBF increased significantly from 3.5 to 4.3 mL/min per 100 mL of tissue (approximately 13%-18% increase). Sedative doses of remifentanil resulted in analgesia but no changes in neurocirculatory end-points except FBF. Direct effects of remifentanil on regional vascular tone may play a role in promoting hypotension. ⋯ Remifentanil occasionally has been associated with hypotension, the mechanism of which is unclear. This study found that remifentanil directly causes the forearm arterial vasculature to dilate.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 2003
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe numeric rating scale and labor epidural analgesia.
A verbal numeric 0-10 rating scale (NRS) is widely used to evaluate pain in research studies, but its usefulness to the clinician is not well established. In this study, we define desire for additional analgesic medication as a clinically relevant outcome in research studies about pain and compare it with the results of the NRS. A post hoc analysis of three studies that we previously conducted concerning labor epidural analgesia was performed. In all three studies, a verbal NRS score was obtained before and 15 min after labor epidural analgesia. At 15 min, the woman was also asked if she wanted more pain medication. We found that very few patients (2%) with a NRS score of 0-1 wanted more medication. When the NRS score was 2 or 3, 51% of the patients wanted more medication, and when the NRS score was >3, almost all patients (93%) wanted more medication. Grouping the final NRS scores into 3 categories (0 or 1, 2 or 3, and >3) is more useful to the clinician than using individual NRS scores. ⋯ This study demonstrated that unless the score of the verbal numeric 0-10 rating scale (NRS) is 0 or 1, most women want more analgesic medication for labor epidural analgesia. Additionally, we found that grouping the NRS values into 3 categories for analysis (0 or 1, 2 or 3, and > 3) is more useful to the clinician than using the full spectrum of NRS scores.