Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 2011
Editorial CommentMining for mutations in malignant hyperthermia.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 2011
The effect of a new water-soluble sedative-hypnotic drug, JM-1232(-), on long-term potentiation in the CA1 region of the mouse hippocampus.
JM-1232(-) {(-)-3-[2-(4-methyl-1-piperazinyl)-2-oxoethyl]-2-phenyl-3,5,6,7-tetrahydrocyclopenta[f]isoindol-1(2H)-one} is a new water-soluble sedative-hypnotic drug with affinity for the benzodiazepine binding site on γ-aminobutyric acid A receptors. The effects of JM-1232(-) on synaptic transmission in the brain are not known. In the present study, we investigated the effects of JM-1232(-) on synaptic transmission, synaptic plasticity (i.e., long-term potentiation [LTP] and paired-pulse facilitation), and excitatory/inhibitory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs/IPSCs) of pyramidal neurons in the CA1 region of mouse hippocampal slices. ⋯ JM-1232(-) enhances synaptic inhibition and impairs LTP and paired-pulse facilitation in area CA1 of the mouse hippocampus. These effects were mediated by benzodiazepine binding sites on γ-aminobutyric acid A receptors.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 2011
Multicenter StudyLack of effectiveness of the pulmonary artery catheter in cardiac surgery.
The pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) continues to be used for monitoring of hemodynamics in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery despite concerns raised in other settings regarding both effectiveness and safety. Given the relative paucity of data regarding its use in CABG patients, and given entrenched practice patterns, we assessed the impact of PAC use on fatal and nonfatal CABG outcomes as practiced at a diverse set of medical centers. ⋯ Use of a PAC during CABG surgery was associated with increased mortality and a higher risk of severe end-organ complications in this propensity-matched observational study. A randomized controlled trial with defined hemodynamic goals would be ideal to either confirm or refute our findings.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 2011
Review Historical ArticleReview article: Preventive analgesia: quo vadimus?
The classic definition of preemptive analgesia requires 2 groups of patients to receive identical treatment before or after incision or surgery. The only difference between the 2 groups is the timing of administration of the drug relative to incision. The constraint to include a postincision or postsurgical treatment group is methodologically appealing, because in the presence of a positive result, it provides a window of time within which the observed effect occurred, and thus points to possible mechanisms underlying the effect: the classic view assumes that the intraoperative nociceptive barrage contributes to a greater extent to postoperative pain than does the postoperative nociceptive barrage. ⋯ This requirement ensures that the observed effects are not direct analgesic effects. In this article, we briefly review the history of preemptive analgesia and relate it to the broader concept of preventive analgesia. We highlight clinical trial designs and examples from the literature that distinguish preventive analgesia from preemptive analgesia and conclude with suggestions for future research.